These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 479358)

  • 1. Broth dilution minimum inhibitory concentrations: rationale for use of selected antimicrobial concentrations.
    Witebsky FG; Maclowry JD; French SS
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 May; 9(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 479358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of 44 antimicrobial agents against three standard control strains in broth with and without human serum.
    Reimer LG; Stratton CW; Reller LB
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1981 Jun; 19(6):1050-5. PubMed ID: 6791584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Clostridium difficile minimum inhibitory concentrations obtained using agar dilution vs broth microdilution methods.
    Hastey CJ; Dale SE; Nary J; Citron D; Law JH; Roe-Carpenter DE; Chesnel L
    Anaerobe; 2017 Apr; 44():73-77. PubMed ID: 28188880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Broth microdilution test for the standardized determination of minimal inhibitory and minimal bactericidal concentrations of antimicrobial drugs in rapidly growing aerobic bacteria].
    Klare I; Witte W
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1988 Feb; 34(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 3369199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Broth-dilution method for determining the antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria.
    Stalons DR; Thornsberry C
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1975 Jan; 7(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 1137356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of agar dilution and broth microdilution methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of Helicobacter cinaedi.
    Tomida J; Oumi A; Okamoto T; Morita Y; Okayama A; Misawa N; Hayashi T; Akaike T; Kawamura Y
    Microbiol Immunol; 2013 May; 57(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 23668607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Reference Broth Microdilution Method for Dalbavancin In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria that Grow Aerobically.
    Koeth LM; DiFranco-Fisher JM; McCurdy S
    J Vis Exp; 2015 Sep; (103):. PubMed ID: 26381422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of agar dilution, tube dilution, and broth microdilution susceptibility tests for determination of ramoplanin MICs.
    Kenny MT; Brackman MA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1364-5. PubMed ID: 8051270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A report from the committee on microbroth dilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing : issues in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae: a comparison of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy lysed horse blood and the CLSI HTM broth microdilution methods.
    Yamaguchi K; Hirakata Y; Kobayashi I; Ikedo M; Ohno A
    J Infect Chemother; 2012 Feb; 18(1):134-43. PubMed ID: 21894455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the Sensititre system for quantitative antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing: a collaborative study.
    Gavan TL; Jones RN; Barry AL
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Mar; 17(3):464-9. PubMed ID: 7425606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Techniques for anaerobic susceptibility testing.
    Thornsberry C
    J Infect Dis; 1977 Mar; 135 Suppl():S4-6. PubMed ID: 850089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of diffusion and dilution methods to determine the antimicrobial activity of water-soluble chitosan derivatives.
    Jiang L; Wang F; Han F; Prinyawiwatkul W; No HK; Ge B
    J Appl Microbiol; 2013 Apr; 114(4):956-63. PubMed ID: 23279192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Results of an interlaboratory test on antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria from animals by broth microdilution.
    Wallmann J; Böttner A; Goossens L; Hafez HM; Hartmann K; Kaspar H; Kehrenberg C; Kietzmann M; Klarmann D; Klein G; Krabisch P; Kühn T; Luhofer G; Richter A; Schulz B; Schwarz S; Sigge C; Traeder W; Waldmann KH; Werckenthin C; ; Zschiesche E
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2006 Jun; 27(6):482-90. PubMed ID: 16697559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the E Test to agar dilution, broth microdilution, and agar diffusion susceptibility testing techniques by using a special challenge set of bacteria.
    Baker CN; Stocker SA; Culver DH; Thornsberry C
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Mar; 29(3):533-8. PubMed ID: 2037671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of an automated procedure determining the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC). ].
    Thabaut A; Durosoir JL; Meyran M
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1982 Jun; 30(6 Pt 2):555-9. PubMed ID: 6750524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the sensititre microdilution antibiotic susceptibility system against recent clinical isolates: three-laboratory collaborative study.
    Jones RN; Gavan TL; Barry AL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Apr; 11(4):426-9. PubMed ID: 7372803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parallel analysis of antimicrobial activities in microbial community by SSCP based on CE.
    Chung JH; Park YS; Kim J; Shin GW; Nam MH; Oh MK; Kim CW; Jung GY; Hyun Park J
    Electrophoresis; 2007 Jul; 28(14):2416-23. PubMed ID: 17577886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EUCAST Definitive Document E.DEF 3.1, June 2000: Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antibacterial agents by agar dilution.
    European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Dieases (ESCMID)
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2000 Sep; 6(9):509-15. PubMed ID: 11168187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations for Staphylococcus aureus obtained with the automated Phoenix™ system, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method and the standard Etest.
    Muñoz-Cobo B; Sancho-Tello S; Costa E; Bravo D; Torregrosa I; de Lomas JG; Navarro D
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2011 Mar; 37(3):278-9. PubMed ID: 21269809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Collaborative evaluation of the microbial profile system for quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
    Gerlach EH; Jones RN; Barry AL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Mar; 17(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 6841580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.