BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4795165)

  • 1. Stimulus familiarization with pictures and words in paired-associate learning.
    Wicker FW; Edmonston LP; McClure HD
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Sep; 86(3):617-26. PubMed ID: 4795165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Picture-word differences in the acquisition and retention of paired associates.
    Postman L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1978 Mar; 4(2):146-57. PubMed ID: 632757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing of interactive and noninteractive pictures in PA learning by retarded persons.
    Ashford DC; Baumeister AA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1977 Sep; 82(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 907010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Information processing deficits of alcoholic Korsakoff patients.
    Cermak LS; Butters N
    Q J Stud Alcohol; 1973 Dec; 34(4):1110-32. PubMed ID: 4767541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and transfer of mediational strategies by retarded children in paired-associate learning.
    Wanschura PB; Borkowski JG
    Am J Ment Defic; 1974 Mar; 78(5):631-9. PubMed ID: 4820213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single-letter selection in paired-associate learning by retardates as a function of degree of learning.
    Berry FM; Joubert CE; Baumeister AA
    J Gen Psychol; 1972 Jul; 87(1st Half):145-6. PubMed ID: 5043864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of external emphasis and redundancy level on the paired-associate learning of retarded adolescents and nonretarded children.
    Spitz HH; Borys SV
    Am J Ment Defic; 1974 May; 78(6):723-9. PubMed ID: 4838150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of stimulus familiarity on the rehearsal strategies transfer mechanism in retarded and nonretarded individuals.
    Dugas J
    Am J Ment Defic; 1975 Nov; 80(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 1190273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Children's memory for picture versus word responses in paired associates: recall and recognition tests.
    Homzie MJ; Noyes EJ; Lovelace EA
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Sep; 86(3):567-77. PubMed ID: 4780123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of type of stimulus component cue selection.
    Wolfgang AK; Richardson J
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Sep; 86(3):635-42. PubMed ID: 4780126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):734-48. PubMed ID: 16822144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revisiting the picture-superiority effect in symbolic comparisons: do pictures provide privileged access?
    Amrhein PC; McDaniel MA; Waddill P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):843-57. PubMed ID: 12219794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus meaning and complexity as factors in the transfer of stimulus predifferentiation.
    Ellis HC; Muller DG; Tosti DT
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 May; 71(5):629-33. PubMed ID: 5939699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transfer of stimulus predifferentiation to shape recognition and identification learning: role of properties of verbal labels.
    Ellis HC
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 Nov; 78(3):401-9. PubMed ID: 5705855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stimulus selection by the retarded: list length and response requirement.
    Berry F; Baumeister AA; Duncan EM
    Am J Psychol; 1975 Mar; 88(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 1236564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distribution of practice in paired-associate learning.
    Mordock JB
    Am J Ment Defic; 1968 Nov; 73(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 5699742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of spontaneous vs. externally-cued learning on the permanent storage of a schema by retardates.
    Spitz HH; Webreck CA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1972 Sep; 77(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 5081083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus property mediation of paired-associates learning.
    Reich JW; Alexander RA
    J Gen Psychol; 1970 Oct; 83(2d Half):213-25. PubMed ID: 5474312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transfer of predifferentiation training to gradients of generalization in shape recognition.
    Ellis HC; Feuge RL
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Apr; 71(4):539-42. PubMed ID: 5909080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus selection as influenced by degrees of learning, attention, prior associations, and experience with the stimulus components.
    Houston JP
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Apr; 73(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 6034006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.