These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Hospitals and review. Thompson RW Ala J Med Sci; 1985 Oct; 22(4):400-2. PubMed ID: 4073390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Needed: a center to study medical practice. Waxman HA Resume; 1977; ():5-6. PubMed ID: 10307798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Quality assessment: a growing reality in medical practice. Bull Am Coll Physicians; 1976 Jul; 17(7):26-7, 46. PubMed ID: 1036221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Professional review in Australia. Brand IA QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1981 Feb; 7(2):2-6. PubMed ID: 6785703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Components of the PSRO review system in short-stay hospitals. Fielding JE; Ellis GL J Am Podiatry Assoc; 1975 Dec; 65(12):1118-22. PubMed ID: 1238453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. New federal regulations, professional standards review organization, JCAH and criteria development. Tucker JH; Rogers J Med Rec News; 1975 Feb; 46(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 10318407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Peer review organizations expected to have major impact on UR. Hosp Peer Rev; 1982 Nov; 7(11):136-7. PubMed ID: 10273331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Control over the utilization of medical services. Stuart B; Stockton R Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1973; 51(3):341-94. PubMed ID: 4587004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Professionalism, accountability and peer review. Luke RD; Modrow RE Health Serv Res; 1982; 17(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 6954151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Priorities in utilization review. Jones B Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 Apr; 3(4):50-1. PubMed ID: 10307590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Hospital utilization review--an essential element in health care cost containment. Handel B Empl Benefits J; 1984 Sep; 9(3):8-12, 30. PubMed ID: 10273548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The relationship between adjusted hospital mortality and the results of peer review. Hartz AJ; Gottlieb MS; Kuhn EM; Rimm AA Health Serv Res; 1993 Feb; 27(6):765-77. PubMed ID: 8428812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Who's in charge of utilization review? Ankrum AD Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 May; 3(5):60-1. PubMed ID: 10273108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. PRO proposal jeopardizes confidentiality. Am Med News; 1984 Jul; 27(27):4. PubMed ID: 11653592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Health care regulation via PSRO: the management control system of concurrent stay review. Dittman DA Socioecon Issues Health; 1980; ():39-57. PubMed ID: 10309697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Medicare and Medicaid programs; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO); assumption of responsibilities and Medicare review functions and coordination of Medicaid with peer review organization--HCFA. Proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1984 Jul; 49(138):29026-41. PubMed ID: 10299606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]