These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4803696)
1. The measurement of electrodermal activity: an instrument for recording log skin admittance. Montagu JD Biol Psychol; 1973; 1(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 4803696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An automatic voltage suppressor for the measurement of electrodermal activity. Simon WR; Homoth RW Psychophysiology; 1978 Sep; 15(5):502-5. PubMed ID: 693766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Continuous recordings of impedance and phase angle during electrodermal reactions and the locus of impedance change. Boucsein W; Schaefer F; Neijenhuisen H Psychophysiology; 1989 May; 26(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 2756087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Portable transistor instrument for recording the galvanic skin response. Salabai VD; Doroshev VD Biomed Eng (NY); 1974 Mar; 7(3):182-4. PubMed ID: 4817134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrodermal activity by DC potential and AC conductance measured simultaneously at the same skin site. Grimnes S; Jabbari A; Martinsen ØG; Tronstad C Skin Res Technol; 2011 Feb; 17(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 20923453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A wireless portable physiology recorder for psychophysiology research based on a personal digital assistant. Schrama T Behav Res Methods; 2009 Aug; 41(3):827-32. PubMed ID: 19587198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PROBLEMS IN MEASUREMENT OF ELECTRODERMAL PHENOMENA--CHOICE OF METHOD AND PHENOMENA--POTENTIAL, IMPEDANCE, RESISTANCE. FORBES TW Psychophysiology; 1964 Jul; 1():26-30. PubMed ID: 14201840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Impedance measurement of individual skin surface electrodes. Grimnes S Med Biol Eng Comput; 1983 Nov; 21(6):750-5. PubMed ID: 6664135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An instrument for producing accumulative tracings on polygraph recorders. Thorne PR Psychophysiology; 1965 Apr; 1(4):364-7. PubMed ID: 5828010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An instrument for producing irregular but controlled timed periods. Thorne PR; Andrews JH Psychophysiology; 1966 Jan; 2(3):267-70. PubMed ID: 5903580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Trial equipment to measure skin conductance, based on the recommendations of The Society for Psychophysiological Research]. Niimi Y Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1983 Dec; 54(5):325-7. PubMed ID: 6672380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between the AC and DC measurement of electrodermal activity. Pabst O; Tronstad C; Grimnes S; Fowles D; Martinsen ØG Psychophysiology; 2017 Mar; 54(3):374-385. PubMed ID: 28000290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unibase/glycol as an electrolyte medium for recording the electrodermal duct filling response. Schneider RE; Fowles DC Psychophysiology; 1979 Jan; 16(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 758628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A direct comparison of the skin conductance and skin resistance methods. Boucsein W; Hoffmann G Psychophysiology; 1979 Jan; 16(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 758630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A major effect of recording site on measurement of electrodermal activity. Scerbo AS; Freedman LW; Raine A; Dawson ME; Venables PH Psychophysiology; 1992 Mar; 29(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 1635967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement of low-resistance points on the skin by dry roller electrodes. Yamamoto T; Yamamoto Y; Yasuhara K; Yamaguchi Y; Yasumo W; Yoshida A IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1988 Mar; 35(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 3350549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A MODIFIED DESIGN FOR THE LYKKEN ZINC ELECTRODES. KAPLAN S; FISHER GR Psychophysiology; 1964 Jul; 1():88-9. PubMed ID: 14201849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Dependence of EDR recovery times and other electrodermal measures on scale of measurement: a methodological clarification. Sagberg F Psychophysiology; 1980 Sep; 17(5):506-9. PubMed ID: 7465721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences in readiness potential associated with push-button construction. Ford JM; MacPherson L; Kopell BS Psychophysiology; 1972 Sep; 9(5):564-7. PubMed ID: 5075589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]