These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 480383)

  • 1. Treatment of young investigators in the National Cancer Program.
    Kalberer JT
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1979 Oct; 63(4):1097-103. PubMed ID: 480383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Funding impact of the National Cancer Act and beyond.
    Kalberer JT; Newell GR
    Cancer Res; 1979 Oct; 39(10):4274-84. PubMed ID: 383282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of the National Cancer Act on grant support.
    Kalberer JT
    Cancer Res; 1975 Mar; 35(3):472-81. PubMed ID: 1090361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends in program project grant funding at the National Cancer Institute.
    Broder S; Cushing M
    Cancer Res; 1993 Feb; 53(3):477-84. PubMed ID: 8425180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. National Cancer Institute's Small Grants Program for behavioral research in cancer control boosts careers for new investigators and fulfills NIH research priorities.
    Chollette VY; Crowley K
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Nov; 16(11):2459-63. PubMed ID: 18006937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The peer review process: how to prepare research grant applications to the NIH.
    Novello AC
    Miner Electrolyte Metab; 1985; 11(5):281-6. PubMed ID: 4047004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
    Piver MS
    Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 1: the assignment and referral processes.
    Henley C
    Fed Proc; 1977 Jul; 36(8):2066-8. PubMed ID: 872944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 3: review by an advisory board/council.
    Henley C
    Fed Proc; 1977 Sep; 36(10):2335-8. PubMed ID: 892000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Funding: grants or contracts? A survey of cancer scientists.
    Mandel HG; Hirschberg E; Burchenal JH; Shimkin MB
    Cancer Res; 1975 May; 35(5):1109-15. PubMed ID: 1120302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Special Populations Networks for cancer awareness research and training.
    Chu KC; Jackson FE
    Pac Health Dialog; 2004 Sep; 11(2):222-4. PubMed ID: 16281704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2008 Oct; 135(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 18957192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Site visits for the review of grant applications to the National Institutes of Health: Views of an applicant and a scientist administrator.
    Merritt DH; Eaves GN
    Fed Proc; 1975 Feb; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 1116610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A curbstone consult to applicants for National Institute of Mental Health grant support.
    Rush AJ; Gullion CM; Prien RF
    Psychopharmacol Bull; 1996; 32(3):311-20. PubMed ID: 8961773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Growing pains for NIH grant review.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16751088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two facets of peer review and the proper role of study sections.
    Lenard J
    Account Res; 2006; 13(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 17124762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review of researchgrant applications at the National Institutes of Health 2: review by an initial review group.
    Henley C
    Fed Proc; 1977 Aug; 36(9):2186-90. PubMed ID: 885260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparability of the American Cancer Society and National Institutes of Health peer review systems.
    Vivona S; Do van Quy D
    Cancer Res; 1973 Apr; 33(4):919. PubMed ID: 4739656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lessons from the history of tobacco harm reduction: The National Cancer Institute's Smoking and Health Program and the "less hazardous cigarette".
    Parascandola M
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2005 Oct; 7(5):779-89. PubMed ID: 16191749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.