These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4805556)

  • 1. The perception of sub-phonemic phonetic differences.
    Bond ZS
    Lang Speech; 1973; 16(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 4805556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory and phonetic levels of processing in speech perception: neurophysiological and information-processing analyses.
    Wood CC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Feb; 104(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 1170274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phonetic, phonemic, and phonological factors in cross-language discrimination of phonotactic contrasts.
    Davidson L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):270-82. PubMed ID: 21090904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cerebral laterality for phonemic and prosodic cue decoding in children with autism.
    Minagawa-Kawai Y; Naoi N; Kikuchi N; Yamamoto J; Nakamura K; Kojima S
    Neuroreport; 2009 Aug; 20(13):1219-24. PubMed ID: 19617855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory and linguistic processes in the perception of intonation contours.
    Studdert-Kennedy M; Hadding K
    Lang Speech; 1973; 16(4):293-313. PubMed ID: 4805552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural correlates of switching from auditory to speech perception.
    Dehaene-Lambertz G; Pallier C; Serniclaes W; Sprenger-Charolles L; Jobert A; Dehaene S
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 15588593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phonetic processing areas revealed by sinewave speech and acoustically similar non-speech.
    Benson RR; Richardson M; Whalen DH; Lai S
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):342-53. PubMed ID: 16530428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feature processing in the perception and production of speech.
    Cooper WE; Lauritsen MR
    Nature; 1974 Nov; 252(5479):121-3. PubMed ID: 4425217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The comparative skills of monolinguals and bilinguals in perceiving phoneme sequences.
    Cohen SP; Tucker GR; Lambert WE
    Lang Speech; 1967; 10(3):159-68. PubMed ID: 5583882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fricative and plosive perception-identification as a function of phonetic context in CVCVC utterance.
    Treon MA
    Lang Speech; 1970; 13(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 5431745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The phonetic test. Measure of audition and perception of speech].
    Lafon JC
    An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am; 1983; 10(3):197-218. PubMed ID: 6688330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distinctive features in speech pathology: phonology or phonemics?
    Parker F
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1976 Feb; 41(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 1256039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phonological abstraction without phonemes in speech perception.
    Mitterer H; Scharenborg O; McQueen JM
    Cognition; 2013 Nov; 129(2):356-61. PubMed ID: 23973464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phonetic distortions in the serial transmission of short speech samples.
    Tiffany WR; Bennett DN
    J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Mar; 11(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 5648538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noun and noun phrase stress: a phonetic study of English supplemented with an error analysis using Finnish speaker-hearers, II. Perception.
    Niemi J
    Lang Speech; 1979; 22(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 542053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proceedings: Edith Whetnall lecture. Acoustic cues in the speech of the hearing and the deaf.
    Fry DB
    Proc R Soc Med; 1973 Oct; 66(10):959-69. PubMed ID: 4759742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The investigation of the disintegration of phonemic discrimination on a perception and production level in adults with aphasia.
    Levinsohn J
    J S Afr Speech Hear Assoc; 1969 Dec; 16(1):48-62. PubMed ID: 5407535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Approach to disorders of phonemic integration in aphasic patients. Significance of sonographic analysis].
    Degiovanni E; Khomsi A; Bosser E; Souffront C; Mollet JN; Posson J
    Rev Otoneuroophtalmol; 1977; 49(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 897452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The link between speech perception and production is phonological and abstract: evidence from the shadowing task.
    Mitterer H; Ernestus M
    Cognition; 2008 Oct; 109(1):168-73. PubMed ID: 18805522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phonetic feature theory: the linguist, the speech scientist and the speech pathologist.
    Cairns HS
    J Commun Disord; 1975 Jun; 8(2):157-70. PubMed ID: 803159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.