These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Current-based versus energy-based ventricular defibrillation: a prospective study. Lerman BB; DiMarco JP; Haines DE J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Nov; 12(5):1259-64. PubMed ID: 3170969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnosis, not energy or weight, determines ventricular defibrillation. Cherwek ML; Sipes JN; Gascho JA; Hunter FP; O'Brien WM; Crampton RS Va Med; 1980 Apr; 107(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 7368825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Low energy cardioversion with the implantable cardioversion defibrillator devices for treatment of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation]. Siebels J; Schneider MA; Kuck KH Z Kardiol; 1993 Nov; 82(11):683-91. PubMed ID: 8291289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-energy versus low-energy defibrillation: experience in patients (excluding those in the intensive care unit) at Mayo Clinic-affiliated hospitals. Morgan JP; Hearne SF; Raizes GS; White RD; Giuliani ER Mayo Clin Proc; 1984 Dec; 59(12):829-34. PubMed ID: 6503363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Energy doses for treatment of out-of-hospital pediatric ventricular fibrillation. Rossano JW; Quan L; Kenney MA; Rea TD; Atkins DL Resuscitation; 2006 Jul; 70(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 16762479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pediatric defibrillation doses often fail to terminate prolonged out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in children. Berg MD; Samson RA; Meyer RJ; Clark LL; Valenzuela TD; Berg RA Resuscitation; 2005 Oct; 67(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 16199288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ventricular defibrillation -- a comparative trial using 175-J and 320-J shocks. Weaver WD; Cobb LA; Copass MK; Hallstrom AP N Engl J Med; 1982 Oct; 307(18):1101-6. PubMed ID: 7121527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapidly switching multidirectional defibrillation: reversal of ventricular fibrillation with lower energy shocks. Viana MA; Bassani RA; Petrucci O; Marques DA; Bassani JW J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Dec; 148(6):3213-8. PubMed ID: 25173125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A model of ischemically induced ventricular fibrillation for comparison of fixed-dose and escalating-dose defibrillation strategies. Niemann JT; Rosborough JP; Walker RG Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Jun; 11(6):619-24. PubMed ID: 15175198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated external defibrillators: to what extent does the algorithm delay CPR? Rea TD; Shah S; Kudenchuk PJ; Copass MK; Cobb LA Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Aug; 46(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 16046942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of efficacy of pulsed biphasic waveform and rectilinear biphasic waveform in a short ventricular fibrillation pig model. Li Y; Wang H; Cho JH; Didon JP; Bisera J; Weil MH; Tang W Resuscitation; 2009 Sep; 80(9):1047-51. PubMed ID: 19604618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transthoracic ventricular defibrillation in the adult. Adgey AA; Campbell NP; Webb SW; Kennedy AL; Pantridge JF Med Instrum; 1978; 12(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 634183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Very high survival among patients defibrillated at an early stage after in-hospital ventricular fibrillation on wards with and without monitoring facilities. Herlitz J; Aune S; Bång A; Fredriksson M; Thorén AB; Ekström L; Holmberg S Resuscitation; 2005 Aug; 66(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 15955610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. BIPHASIC Trial: a randomized comparison of fixed lower versus escalating higher energy levels for defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Stiell IG; Walker RG; Nesbitt LP; Chapman FW; Cousineau D; Christenson J; Bradford P; Sookram S; Berringer R; Lank P; Wells GA Circulation; 2007 Mar; 115(12):1511-7. PubMed ID: 17353443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]