These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4805736)
1. A formula for the 1970s: estimating need for subsidized family planning services in the United States. Guttmacher AF Fam Plann Perspect; 1973; 5(3):145-74. PubMed ID: 4805736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A formula for the 1970s: estimating need for subsidized family planning services. Commentary: Family planning need and the future of the family planning program. Guttmacher AF Fam Plann Perspect; 1973; 5(3):175-6. PubMed ID: 4805737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Family planning services from multiple provider types: an assessment for the United States. Hendershot GE Stud Fam Plann; 1983; 14(8-9):218-27. PubMed ID: 6636223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Planning status of marital births, 1975-1976. Anderson JE Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(2):62-3, 67-70. PubMed ID: 7250341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fertility and family planning in the 1970s: the National Survey of Family Growth. Mosher WD Fam Plann Perspect; 1982; 14(6):314-20. PubMed ID: 7151988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Unmet needs in family planning: a world survey. Robbins J Fam Plann Perspect; 1973; 5(4):232-6. PubMed ID: 4805742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Commentary: some policy and program implications of "contraceptive failure in the United States". Jaffe FS Fam Plann Perspect; 1973; 5(3):143-4. PubMed ID: 4805735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Family planning in the 1970s--a dynamic force affecting the status of children. Gray NT Child Welfare; 1971 Mar; 50(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 5164338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pregnancy among single American teen-agers. Vadies G; Pomeroy R Adv Plan Parent; 1975; 10(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 1234079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Contraceptive development and better family planning. Segal SJ Bull N Y Acad Med; 1996; 73(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 8804742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of family planning clinic programs on adolescent pregnancy. Forrest JD; Hermalin AI; Henshaw SK Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 7250347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The World Fertility Survey: charting global childbearing. Lightbourne R ; Singh S; Green CP Popul Bull; 1982 Mar; 37(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 12311520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures. Forrest JD; Samara R Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 8886761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The prediction of fertility among Catholics: a longitudinal analysis. Wilson FD; Bumpass L Demography; 1973 Nov; 10(4):591-7. PubMed ID: 4804739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pattern of demand for children in Pakistan. Ahmed T Pak Popul Rev; 1992; 3(1):41-66. PubMed ID: 12344809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The place of family planning in the recent change in the birth rate in Tunisia]. Vallin J; Lapham R Rev Tunis Sci Soc; 1969; 6(17-18):379-413. PubMed ID: 12146217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Program planning for family planning services. Sieverts S Fam Plann Perspect; 1970 Mar; 2(2):2-5. PubMed ID: 5520626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using standard data for program evaluation in Cleveland. Chokel PK; Dingle JT Fam Plann Perspect; 1973; 5(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 4618207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]