These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4809655)

  • 1. Effects of masking tasks on differential eyelid conditioning: a distinction between knowledge of stimulus contingencies and attentional or cognitive activities involving them.
    Nelson MN; Ross LE
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Jan; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 4809655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Backward masking of conditioned stimuli: effects on differential and single-cue classical conditioning performance.
    Ross LE; Ferreira MC; Ross SM
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Oct; 103(4):603-13. PubMed ID: 4448963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential GSR conditioning accompanied by a two-light prediction task.
    Hunt DP; Daily RF
    J Gen Psychol; 1974 Apr; 90(2d Half):165-77. PubMed ID: 4833495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attention and processing capacity in auditory recognition.
    Moore JJ; Massaro DW
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Jun; 99(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 4714081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of awareness in differential conditioning.
    Ross LE; Nelson MN
    Psychophysiology; 1973 Jan; 10(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 4684239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of central processing on auditory recognition.
    Massaro DW; Kahn BJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Jan; 97(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 4704196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Backward masking and interference with the processing of brief visual displays.
    Di Lollo V; Lowe DG; Scott JP
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Nov; 103(5):934-40. PubMed ID: 4443767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential and reversal conditioning in partially neodecorticate rabbits.
    Oakley DA; Russell IS
    Physiol Behav; 1974 Aug; 13(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 4412814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention.
    Walsh KP; Pasanen EG; McFadden D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2737-57. PubMed ID: 25994703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual evoked potentials during stimulus selection in eyelid conditioning in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).
    Kinkaide PS; Walley RE
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1974 Sep; 87(3):481-94. PubMed ID: 4416871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1186():224-32. PubMed ID: 18005944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. II. Selective attention and learning under various levels of stimulus uncertainty.
    Watson CS; Kelly WJ; Wroton HW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1976 Nov; 60(5):1176-86. PubMed ID: 977844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overshadowing and stimulus intensity.
    Mackintosh NJ
    Anim Learn Behav; 1976 May; 4(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 964444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Studies of auditory-visual differences in human time judgment. 2. More transmitted information with sounds than lights.
    Lhamon WT; Goldstone S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Aug; 39(1):295-307. PubMed ID: 4415925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Irrelevant auditory and visual events induce a visual attentional blink.
    Van der Burg E; Nieuwenstein MR; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):80-9. PubMed ID: 23047915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is visual attention required for robust picture memory?
    Wolfe JM; Horowitz TS; Michod KO
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(7):955-64. PubMed ID: 17306854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sound affects the speed of visual processing.
    Keetels M; Vroomen J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):699-708. PubMed ID: 20854000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional bias between modalities: effect on the internal clock, memory, and decision stages used in animal time discrimination.
    Meck WH
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1984; 423():528-41. PubMed ID: 6588813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.