These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Improving evoked response audiometry. Results of normative studies for machine scoring. Schimmel H; Rapin I; Cohen MM Audiology; 1975; 14(5-6):466-79. PubMed ID: 1156252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The auditory stimuli to evoke a clear average response at behavioral threshold. Funasaka S; Kodera K; Abe H Audiology; 1974; 13(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 4814985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Objective audiometry by recording of early and middle-latency auditory evoked potentials using an external method]. Greiner GF; Conraux C; Feblot P Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1978; 95(1-2):33-41. PubMed ID: 655560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Calculating the hearing threshold from the stapedius reflex threshold for different sound stimuli. Niemeyer W; Sesterhenn G Audiology; 1974; 13(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 4412282 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Electrocochleography or evoked cortical responses: which is preferable in diagnosis of hearing loss. Sohmer H; Pratt H; Feinmesser M Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1974; 95(7-8):515-22. PubMed ID: 4460144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Further clinical experiences with electric-response audiometry (Audio-EEG) in children with hearing disorders]. Biesalski P; Leitner H Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1971; 199(2):551-2. PubMed ID: 5153166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Evoked responses--introductory studies on their relationship to the perception of language. Sharrard GA J Laryngol Otol; 1969 Oct; 83(10):947-58. PubMed ID: 5350213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A survey of hearing by evoked response audiometry in a group of normally hearing schoolchildren. Beagley HA; Kellogg SE J Laryngol Otol; 1970 May; 84(5):481-93. PubMed ID: 5428056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]