These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. The process of 'taking-into-account' in visual perception. Epstein W Perception; 1973; 2(3):267-85. PubMed ID: 4794124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of static and motion parallax depth information on perception of size in children and adults. Yonas A; Hagen M J Exp Child Psychol; 1973 Apr; 15(2):254-65. PubMed ID: 4706240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Descent behavior of rats and chicks in a cliff and non-cliff situation. Soervill JW; Somervill CZ Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Oct; 45(2):391-7. PubMed ID: 917692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stereo and motion parallax cues in human 3D vision: can they vanish without a trace? Rauschecker AM; Solomon SG; Glennerster A J Vis; 2006 Dec; 6(12):1471-85. PubMed ID: 17209749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Motion parallax in the visual cliff situation. Somervill JW Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Feb; 32(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 5548091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Some effects of texture density on visual cliff behavior of the domestic chick. Davidson PW; Whitson TT J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1973 Sep; 84(3):522-6. PubMed ID: 4745820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Stereoscopic depth perception in mental retardation: the problem of directional disparity. Webb TE; Kline LE; Anderson WF Am J Ment Defic; 1973 Nov; 78(3):363-5. PubMed ID: 4769180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of level of depth processing and degree of informational discrepancy on adaptation to uniocular image magnification. Epstein W; Morgan-Paap CL J Exp Psychol; 1974 Apr; 102(4):585-94. PubMed ID: 4824301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The control of relative size by pictorial depth cues in children and adults. Wilcox BL; Teghtsoonian M J Exp Child Psychol; 1971 Jun; 11(3):413-29. PubMed ID: 5570450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The selective effect of visual deprivation on receptive field shape determined neurophysiologically. Ganz L; Fitch M; Satterberg JA Exp Neurol; 1968 Dec; 22(4):614-37. PubMed ID: 5709810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual form agnosia. A specific defect in visual discrimination. Benson DF; Greenberg JP Arch Neurol; 1969 Jan; 20(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 4303441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of selective receptive fields in visual perception. Ganz L Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis; 1970; 48():186-92. PubMed ID: 5458831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Binocular single vision and depth discrimination. Receptive field disparities for central and peripheral vision and binocular interaction on peripheral single units in cat striate cortex. Joshua DE; Bishop PO Exp Brain Res; 1970; 10(4):389-416. PubMed ID: 5422473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A functional link between MT neurons and depth perception based on motion parallax. Kim HR; Angelaki DE; DeAngelis GC J Neurosci; 2015 Feb; 35(6):2766-77. PubMed ID: 25673864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]