These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4811941)

  • 1. Perceptual units in speech recognition.
    Massaro DW
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Feb; 102(2):199-208. PubMed ID: 4811941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of forward versus backward recognition masking.
    Massaro DW
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Oct; 100(2):434-6. PubMed ID: 4745469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attention and processing capacity in auditory recognition.
    Moore JJ; Massaro DW
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Jun; 99(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 4714081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pitch and duration in recognition of music-like structures.
    Chamberlain PJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Apr; 38(2):419-28. PubMed ID: 4824070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Levels of processing in speech perception.
    Aldridge JW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Feb; 4(1):164-77. PubMed ID: 627845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of central processing on auditory recognition.
    Massaro DW; Kahn BJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Jan; 97(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 4704196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech perception under conditions of spectral transformation. I. Phonetic characteristics.
    Blesser B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1972 Mar; 15(1):5-41. PubMed ID: 5012812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processing capacity in a letter-matching task.
    Comstock EM
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Sep; 100(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 4744501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory and linguistic processes in speech perception: inferences from six fusions in dichotic listening.
    Cutting JE
    Psychol Rev; 1976 Mar; 83(2):114-40. PubMed ID: 769016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stream segregation and the illusion of overlap.
    Dannenbring GL; Bregman AS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Nov; 2(4):544-55. PubMed ID: 1011004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a Mandarin tone identification test: sensitivity index d' as a performance measure for individual tones.
    Krenmayr A; Qi B; Liu B; Liu H; Chen X; Han D; Schatzer R; Zierhofer CM
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 21091262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Precategorical selective attention and tonal specificity in auditory recognition.
    Hawkins HL; Thomas GB; Presson JC; Cozic A; Brookmire D
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Sep; 103(3):530-8. PubMed ID: 4448957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preperceptual images, processing time, and perceptual units in auditory perception.
    Massaro DW
    Psychol Rev; 1972 Mar; 79(2):124-45. PubMed ID: 5024158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
    Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Lam C; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tactile communication of speech: a review and an analysis.
    Kirman JH
    Psychol Bull; 1973 Jul; 80(1):54-74. PubMed ID: 4577916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of the duration of a silent interval in nonspeech stimuli: a test of the motor theory of speech perception.
    Baumrin JM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Jun; 17(2):294-309. PubMed ID: 4836047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ear asymmetries on a selective attentional task.
    Heilman KM; Bowers D; Rasbury WC; Ray RM
    Brain Lang; 1977 Jul; 4(3):390-5. PubMed ID: 907877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians.
    Meha-Bettison K; Sharma M; Ibrahim RK; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 28971719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory discrimination as a condition for E-learning based Speech Therapy: a proposal for an auditory discrimination test (ADT) for adult dysarthric speakers.
    Beijer LJ; Rietveld AC; van Stiphout AJ
    J Commun Disord; 2011; 44(6):701-18. PubMed ID: 21719027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simulation framework for auditory discrimination experiments: Revealing the importance of across-frequency processing in speech perception.
    Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2708. PubMed ID: 27250164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.