These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4811941)

  • 21. Differential discriminability or response bias? A signal detection analysis of categorical perception.
    Kopp J; Livermore J
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Nov; 101(1):179-82. PubMed ID: 4759635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Recall of messages presented simultaneously to auditory and visual channels with varying uncertainty and delay of message.
    Newsome LR; Long NR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Feb; 38(1):24. PubMed ID: 4815502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Aging impairs the ability to ignore irrelevant information in frequency discrimination tasks.
    Espinoza-Varas B; Jang H
    Exp Aging Res; 2006; 32(2):209-26. PubMed ID: 16531361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On short and long auditory stores.
    Cowan N
    Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):341-70. PubMed ID: 6385047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dichotic backward masking of complex sounds.
    Darwin DJ
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1971 Nov; 23(4):386-92. PubMed ID: 5148924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Results using the OPAL strategy in Mandarin speaking cochlear implant recipients.
    Vandali AE; Dawson PW; Arora K
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S74-S85. PubMed ID: 27329178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Listening effort at signal-to-noise ratios that are typical of the school classroom.
    Howard CS; Munro KJ; Plack CJ
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Dec; 49(12):928-32. PubMed ID: 21047295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Change deafness and the organizational properties of sounds.
    Gregg MK; Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):974-91. PubMed ID: 18665739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The discrimination of speech and nonspeech stimuli in early infancy.
    Morse PA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1972 Dec; 14(3):477-92. PubMed ID: 4658485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Undistorted and filtered speech audiometry in children with normal hearing.
    Palva A; Jokinen K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(5-6):383-8. PubMed ID: 1202913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of acoustic fine structure cues on the recognition of auditory-only and audiovisual speech.
    Meister H; Fuersen K; Schreitmueller S; Walger M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):3116. PubMed ID: 27369134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Vowel and tone recognition in quiet and in noise among Mandarin-speaking amusics.
    Tang W; Wang XJ; Li JQ; Liu C; Dong Q; Nan Y
    Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():62-69. PubMed ID: 29534831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A neurocognitive model of recognition and pitch segregation.
    McLachlan N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2845-54. PubMed ID: 22087913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech discrimination in quiet and in white noise by patients with peripheral and central lesions.
    Olsen WO; Noffsinger D; Kurdziel S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(5-6):375-82. PubMed ID: 1202912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Recognition memory in noise for speech of varying intelligibility.
    Gilbert RC; Chandrasekaran B; Smiljanic R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):389-99. PubMed ID: 24437779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of contralateral broad-band noise on frequency discrimination.
    Labiak JM; Wilson WR
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1974; 77(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 4829051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auditory psychophysics.
    Plomp R
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1975; 26():207-32. PubMed ID: 1094927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceptual susceptibility to acoustic manipulations in speaker discrimination.
    Sell G; Suied C; Elhilali M; Shamma S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):911-22. PubMed ID: 25698023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.