140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 481203)
1. [Ear protective plugs].
Sułkowski W; Kowalska S; Kieruczenko J; Krezelewska E; Sławiński Z; Wośko S
Med Pr; 1979; 30(3):221-4. PubMed ID: 481203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Effectiveness of ear protective devices].
Taniewski M; Zaborski L; Szczepański C; Nitka J
Med Pr; 1978; 29(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 723611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Double hearing protection and speech intelligibility-room for improvement.
Wagstaff AS; Woxen OJ
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Apr; 72(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 11318022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Behavioural measurements in textile weavers wearing ear protectors.
Bhattacharya SK; Roy A; Tripathi SR; Chatterjee SK
Indian J Med Res; 1985 Jul; 82():56-64. PubMed ID: 4054986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The otolaryngologist and hearing protectors.
Alberti PW; Riko K
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1984 Nov; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 6514358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Objective determinations of individual sound protectors (author's transl)].
Partsch CJ; Hülse M
HNO; 1977 Nov; 25(11):386-8. PubMed ID: 924817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Industrial impulse noise, crest factor and the effect of earmuffs.
Pekkarinen J
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Oct; 48(10):861-6. PubMed ID: 3687731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ear protectors vs. intense impact noise.
Sataloff J; Sataloff RT
Occup Health Saf; 1983 Aug; 52(8):25, 28. PubMed ID: 6621966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The effectiveness of hearing protectors in practice.
Alberti PW; Riko K; Abel SM; Kristensen R
J Otolaryngol; 1979 Aug; 8(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 513182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Instruction and the improvement of hearing protector performance.
Williams W
Noise Health; 2004; 7(25):41-7. PubMed ID: 15703148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Characteristics of noise in different branches of industry and efficacy of attenuating it using noise-proof headphones].
Stark Iu
Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1987 Mar; (3):14-7. PubMed ID: 3583020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of wearing time on hearing protector attenuation.
Abel SM; Rokas D
J Otolaryngol; 1986 Oct; 15(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 3773044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Putting the personal back into PPE: hearing protector effectiveness.
Witt B
Occup Health Saf; 2007 Jun; 76(6):90, 92, 94. PubMed ID: 17595970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of hearing protection on narrowband signal detection in industrial noise.
Abel SM; Kunov H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alberti PW
J Otolaryngol; 1983 Apr; 12(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 6864854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of earphone and sound field methods for estimating noise attenuation of foam earplugs.
Carter NL; Upfold G
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Jun; 54(6):307-12. PubMed ID: 8328360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS
Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hearing protection for industry: types, selection vary with needs.
Occup Health Saf; 1985 Jul; 54(7):22-5. PubMed ID: 4022531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Attenuation efficiency of hearing protectors for workers exposed to noise].
Murakami M; Hirota Y; Ohwada H; Kanemitsu K
Sangyo Igaku; 1984 Mar; 26(2):178-9. PubMed ID: 6503014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in efficiency of earplugs and earmuffs measured as hearing impairments from two workshops.
Ivarsson A; Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Nilsson P
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):194-9. PubMed ID: 6939088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Relative ear protector performance in high vs low sound levels.
Thunder TD; Lankford JE
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Dec; 40(12):1023-9. PubMed ID: 539542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
