142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4813780)
1. Short-term costs and benefits of United States family planning programs.
Jaffe FS
Stud Fam Plann; 1974 Mar; 5(3):98-105. PubMed ID: 4813780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The costs and benefits of government expenditures for family planning programs.
Chamie M; Henshaw SK
Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(3):117-8, 120-4. PubMed ID: 6788597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Major federal resources for family planning programs and services: a summary.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1970 Mar; 2(2):40-1. PubMed ID: 5520628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of Medicaid family planning expansions on unplanned births.
Lindrooth RC; McCullough JS
Womens Health Issues; 2007; 17(2):66-74. PubMed ID: 17403463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term benefits and costs of U.S. family planning programs, 1970-1975.
Jaffe FS; Cutright P
Fam Plann Perspect; 1977; 9(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 403091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost effectiveness in maternal and child health. Implications for program planning and evaluation.
Levin AL
N Engl J Med; 1968 May; 278(19):1041-7. PubMed ID: 5644966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.
Forrest JD; Samara R
Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 8886761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rural and urban family planning services in the United States.
Torres A
Fam Plann Perspect; 1979; 11(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 110616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Public funding of contraceptive services, 1980-1982.
Nestor B
Fam Plann Perspect; 1982; 14(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 6811312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Another look at the costs and benefits of government expenditures for family planning programs.
Healy JB; Englander F; Englander V
Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(6):299-301. PubMed ID: 6421616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How much do family planning programs cost?
Sparer G; Okada LM; Tillinghast S
Fam Plann Perspect; 1973; 5(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 4805722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical programs in foreign technical assistance.
Zaki MH
N Y State J Med; 1975 Jul; 75(8):1315-6. PubMed ID: 1055911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Some economic benefits of birth prevention.
Leasure JW
Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1967 Oct; 45(4):417-25. PubMed ID: 6059994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Government's role in health care financing and delivery.
Brandt EN
J Fla Med Assoc; 1982 Mar; 69(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 7077276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Major federal resources for family planning and population research programs: a summary.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Apr; 3(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 5098782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Family planning funding through four federal-state programs, FY 1997.
Gold RB; Sonfield A
Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 10435216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of federal legislation on maternal and child health services in the United States.
Schlesinger ER
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1974; 52(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 4605273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An ounce of prevention. Is family planning disappearing from the healthcare picture?
Hirshbein N
ZPG Report; 1992 Apr; 24(2):7. PubMed ID: 12285223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. National health insurance and family planning.
Rosoff JI
Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Jul; 3(3):50-5. PubMed ID: 4941456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Public funding for U.S. contraceptive services down since 1980 -- $95 million a year goes to sterilization.
Sukop S
AVSC News; 1992 Mar; 30(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 12285114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
