These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 481403)

  • 21. Ducking the debate over BSNs.
    Van Meter M
    RN; 1985 Aug; 48(8):74. PubMed ID: 3849095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new model for collective bargaining.
    Cleland VS
    Nurs Outlook; 1988; 36(5):228-30. PubMed ID: 3412921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The entry issue: how much longer? An historian's view.
    Fondiller SH
    J N Y State Nurses Assoc; 1986 Jun; 17(2):7-14. PubMed ID: 3459818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Letter from America.
    Nayer DD
    Nurs Times; 1981 May; 77(21):923. PubMed ID: 6909813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Who is the professional nurse? Law for the nurse supervisor.
    Creighton H
    Superv Nurse; 1978 Jul; 9(7):14-8. PubMed ID: 248242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Restricting the RN license to BSN graduates could cloud nursing's future.
    Waters V
    Nurs Health Care; 1986 Mar; 7(3):142-6. PubMed ID: 3633434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A diploma educator's view of entry into practice.
    Mastrangelo RM
    Imprint; 1986; 33(2):47. PubMed ID: 3633868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Educational career mobility: the AD-MS model.
    Burton P; Wilson HS; Styles M
    Calif Nurse; 1978 Dec; 74(6):21-2. PubMed ID: 251438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Member believes change in entry will negatively affective collective bargaining.
    Kilgus N
    Wash Nurse; 1981 Mar; 11(1):6. PubMed ID: 6782762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diploma schools fight ANA proposal.
    LaViolette S
    Mod Healthc; 1980 Jan; 10(1):46. PubMed ID: 10245538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. No! Seven out of ten nurses oppose the professional/technical split.
    Lee A
    RN; 1979 Jan; 42(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 252142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The push for specialty certification.
    Hurley ML
    RN; 1994 Jun; 57(6):36-44. PubMed ID: 7973390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Entry into practice--opinions still vary. Education should define job role, but other factors can be important.
    Mich Hosp; 1988 Mar; 24(3):26-31. PubMed ID: 10286486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Your future - ANA Proposal 85 - no.
    Hughes HV
    Occup Health Nurs; 1980 May; 28(5):19-20. PubMed ID: 6900230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. 1985 proposal spurs debate.
    Shaheen P
    Mich Hosp; 1979 Oct; 15(10):4. PubMed ID: 10243982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The American Nurses' Association certification program.
    Mauksch IG
    Bull Tenn Nurses Assoc; 1977 Jun; 40(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 587659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Brief meeting with American nurses].
    Kroksnes I
    Sykepleien; 1980 Jan; 67(2):14-7. PubMed ID: 6899498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The economic implications of the American Nurses Association proposal on entry into practice.
    Van Winkle RA
    AD Nurse; 1987; 2(6):15-20. PubMed ID: 3676063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hospitals, nurses oppose move to eliminate 8 1/2 percent nursing differential.
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1980; 13(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 10297757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nurses oppose American Medical Association's proposal: AMA's proposal.
    Turner E
    Ky Nurse; 1988; 36(3):11. PubMed ID: 3386284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.