These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4816068)

  • 1. Editorial: The Medical Fees Tribunal.
    Med J Aust; 1974 Jan; 1(4):83-4. PubMed ID: 4816068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Editorial: The fees furore.
    Med J Aust; 1975 Jul; 2(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 1160707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiologists disclose withdrawal of College's relative value scale.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1976 Jan; 30(7):10. PubMed ID: 1037507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Here is MSMS discussion of FTC complaint against medical society.
    Scholten M
    Mich Med; 1979 Sep; 78(26):484-5. PubMed ID: 481255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FTC's concessions on fee-for-service issue could affect you.
    Weiss JB
    Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1980 Feb; 8(2):29-31. PubMed ID: 7348735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Letter: Medical Fees Tribunal determinations.
    Med J Aust; 1974 Feb; 1(7):239-40. PubMed ID: 4821529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gastroenterology and the law.
    Cifarelli PS
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1983 Oct; 78(10):665-6. PubMed ID: 6624743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Case study--FTC vs. AMA.
    Stratton DJ
    Assoc Manage; 1979 Jan; 31(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 10239940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc: consent agreement with analysis to aid public comment; correction.
    Fed Regist; 1978 Oct; 43(211):50698-9. PubMed ID: 10238993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Fees for Norwegian liberal professions].
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1971 Apr; 81(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 5280677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Letter: Medical Fees Tribunal determinations--farewell the consultant physician.
    Harvey P
    Med J Aust; 1974 Feb; 1(7):240. PubMed ID: 4821530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. As the trustbusters see it, everything doctors do is wrong.
    Paxton HT
    Med Econ; 1979 Mar; 56(5):37, 39, 42 passim. PubMed ID: 10240637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Press statements on the proposed new health legislation.
    Med J Aust; 1970 Mar; 1(13):627-8. PubMed ID: 5445855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Federal Council meeting.
    Med J Aust; 1970 Apr; 1(15):741-2. PubMed ID: 5430464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Editorial: Deprofessionalizing the profession.
    Ingelfinger FJ
    N Engl J Med; 1976 Feb; 294(6):334-5. PubMed ID: 1246274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. View from the Hill.
    Bryan JE
    Am Fam Physician; 1980 Jan; 21(1):225-31. PubMed ID: 7350739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blue book 1982.
    Wis Med J; 1983 May; 82(5):1-145. PubMed ID: 6613152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Special meeting of Federal Council.
    Med J Aust; 1972 Mar; 1(13):613-4. PubMed ID: 5023709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. President's address.
    Sando MJ
    Med J Aust; 1975 Apr; 1(s4):15-18. PubMed ID: 1152697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ban balance billing? A US federal court says "no".
    Korck M
    Can Med Assoc J; 1984 Nov; 131(10):1269-70, 1272-3, 1276. PubMed ID: 6498680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.