203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4819501)
1. [Critique of cytology as a mass-screening method].
Pflanz M
Fortschr Med; 1974 Mar; 92(9):351-2 passim. PubMed ID: 4819501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Value of cytologic and gynecology screening tests].
Sachs H
Fortschr Med; 1974 Sep; 92(26):1037-41. PubMed ID: 4606060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Efficacy of organized screening in comparison to spontaneous Pap samples in the prevention of invasive cervical cancer].
Kallio M; Nieminen P; Anttila A; Hakama M
Duodecim; 2001; 117(14):1442-6. PubMed ID: 12181953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Epidemiology of cancer of the cervix uteri (author's transl)].
Sachs H; Hasche C
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1974 Nov; 34(11):921-30. PubMed ID: 4435345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Efficiency of preventive care examinations in carcinoma of the uterine cervix].
Zinser HK
Fortschr Med; 1974 Mar; 92(9):357-9. PubMed ID: 4819503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of organized versus opportunistic cervical cytology screening in Hong Kong.
Kim JJ; Leung GM; Woo PP; Goldie SJ
J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Jun; 26(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 15284314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The costs of cancer screening (author's transl)].
Neumann G
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1975 Aug; 35(8):615-8. PubMed ID: 1175903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost effectiveness of early detection of disease.
Schweitzer SO
Health Serv Res; 1974; 9(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 4829491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical cancer screening in primary care: issues and recommendations.
Mandelblatt J
Prim Care; 1989 Mar; 16(1):133-55. PubMed ID: 2649899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Health examination in Malmöhus County for the diagnosis of pre-invasive cervical cancer].
Ahlgren M; Lindberg LG; Nordqvist S; Stormby N
Lakartidningen; 1971 Jun; 68(30):3389-97. PubMed ID: 5096169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Present status of cytological screening for cervix neoplasms].
Naujoks H
Gynakologe; 1981 Dec; 14(4):204-11. PubMed ID: 6797874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A cervical cytology screening programme in the Thames area. Second and third years of study.
McIndoe WA
N Z Med J; 1966 Oct; 65(410):647-51. PubMed ID: 5224361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Incidence of cervical cancer 5 years after mass screening in the community of Medvesćak].
Juras N; Tućan V; Pirkić A; Sućur A
Acta Med Iugosl; 1984; 38(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 6496168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Present trends in screening procedures.
Holtby I
Midwife Health Visit Community Nurse; 1988 Dec; 24(12):510, 512. PubMed ID: 3231145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the sensitivity of cervical cytology: what are the issues?
Myers ER
Am J Manag Care; 2000 Jul; 6(7):838-40. PubMed ID: 11067380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The effect of various factors on participation in cytologic screening in the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer].
Kavungu P; Ebeling K; Ebert S
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1983; 77(21):883-5. PubMed ID: 6659584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Prophylaxis and early detection of cervix carcinoma].
Held E
Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1970 Jul; 59(28):1021-9. PubMed ID: 5512823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the efficiency of diagnosis of early cervical carcinoma by general practitioners and cytology screening programs in the Netherlands.
Kirk RS; Boon ME
Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 6942616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ["Cost-effectiveness" of cervical screening].
Kostova P
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(6):32-4. PubMed ID: 17974169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Screening for cervix uteri cancer].
Borràs JM; Iglesias X
Med Clin (Barc); 1994; 102 Suppl 1():80-4. PubMed ID: 8170254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
