These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4819501)

  • 21. Economics of screening for cancer of the cervix.
    Hicks S; Edwards D
    N Z Med J; 1986 Nov; 99(814):916. PubMed ID: 3468422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mass screening for cervical carcinoma in Finland. Organization and effect on morbidity and mortality.
    Timonen S; Nieminen U; Kauraniemi T
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 4853102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Systematic screening for cancer of the uterine cervix (epidemiologic aspects)].
    Campion J; Flamant R
    Bull Inst Natl Sante Rech Med; 1966; 21(5):977-94. PubMed ID: 5976404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Screening for cervical cancer. Pap smears can save lives.
    Wong JG; Feussner JR
    N C Med J; 1993 Jul; 54(7):342-5. PubMed ID: 8350931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An assessment of the effectiveness of cervical cytology screening in Sheffield.
    Johnson IS; Milner PC; Todd JN
    Community Med; 1987 May; 9(2):160-70. PubMed ID: 3608418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cost effectiveness of population screening and rescreening for cervical cancer in the Netherlands.
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(5):539-42. PubMed ID: 6792845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Screening the hard to reach: improving morbidity and mortality from cervical cancer in New Zealand.
    Sykes P; Sadler L; Priest P
    N Z Med J; 2008 Jul; 121(1277):5-7. PubMed ID: 18677325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [A program of control of cervico-uterine cancer].
    Jordan S
    Salud Publica Mex; 1968; 10(5):651-5. PubMed ID: 5700053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cervical cytology 1980 -- its place and value.
    Duncan GR
    N Z Med J; 1981 Feb; 93(678):119-22. PubMed ID: 6943454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Rare cytologic findings by gynecologic examinations (author's transl)].
    Büttner HH; Beust M
    Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1977; 47(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 921484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prophylactic examinations for uterine cervix cancer in the female inhabitants of Bialystok District.
    Soszka S
    Pol Med J; 1970; 9(4):1019-26. PubMed ID: 5477483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [A comparison between mass screening for uterine neck cancer in the Districts of Frederiksberg and Maribo].
    Koch F; Klinken L; Albrechtsen R
    Nord Med; 1971 Dec; 86(50):1534. PubMed ID: 5135061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Opportunistic cervical cytology screening in the Dundee catchment area.
    Lang CC; Duncan ID; Duguid HL
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1985 Jul; 43(4):156-66. PubMed ID: 4030321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Detection of cervical cancer at the Bell Telephone Company of Canada (1965-1969)].
    Audet-Lapointe P
    Union Med Can; 1972 Dec; 101(12):2713-6. PubMed ID: 4661704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Differences in cervical cancer mass screening results in Greater-Helsinki area].
    Nieminen P; Tarkkanen J; Timonen T; Meyer B; Hakama M; Anttila A
    Duodecim; 2000; 116(22):2489-96. PubMed ID: 12053343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Improved prognosis for cervical cancers due to comprehensive screening.
    Macgregor JE; Fraser ME; Mann EM
    Acta Cytol; 1972; 16(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 4501868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Papanicolaou cervical smears for screening in asymptomatic women.
    Barnes BA
    Prim Care; 1981 Mar; 8(1):131-40. PubMed ID: 6911755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cervical smears.
    Br Med J; 1977 Jul; 2(6079):122-3. PubMed ID: 406005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. False negative rate in mass screening for cervical cancer.
    Sato S; Mikino H; Matsunaga G; Yajima A
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(3):836-7. PubMed ID: 9622728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.