These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Cochlear potentials in the study of cochlear physiology. Siegel JH Scand Audiol Suppl; 1986; 25():35-47. PubMed ID: 3554482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relation of receptor potentials of cochlear hair cells to spike discharges of cochlear neurons. Weiss TF Annu Rev Physiol; 1984; 46():247-59. PubMed ID: 6370108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison between human and animal cochlear potentials. Kupperman R Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1971 Nov; 92():Suppl:739-51. PubMed ID: 5148988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Postactivation potentiation of guinea pig cochlear microphonic potentials. Veselý C; Faltýnek L Sb Ved Pr Lek Fak Karlovy Univerzity Hradci Kralove; 1971; 14(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 5289894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of the electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on cochlear potentials recorded with intracochlear electrodes in guinea pigs. Konishi T; Slepian JZ J Acoust Soc Am; 1971 Jun; 49(6):1762-9. PubMed ID: 5125722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling and simulation of the cochlear potentials of the guinea pig. Laszlo CA; Milsum JH; Gannon RP J Acoust Soc Am; 1972 Dec; 52(6):1648-60. PubMed ID: 4641369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Physiological basis of cochlear transduction and sensitivity. Honrubia V; Strelioff D; Sitko ST Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1976; 85(6 PT. 1):697-710. PubMed ID: 999136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the limitations of cochlear-microphonic measurements. Dallos P; Schoeny ZG; Cheatham MA J Acoust Soc Am; 1971 Apr; 49(4):Suppl 2:1144+. PubMed ID: 5552192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Observations on cochlear potentials following intensive sound stimuli]. Aran JM Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1966; 87(9):780-4. PubMed ID: 5976753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A macro-mechanical model of the guinea pig cochlea with realistic parameters. Brass D J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):894-907. PubMed ID: 10687699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lumped-parameter model for in vivo cochlear stimulation. Suesserman MF; Spelman FA IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Mar; 40(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 8335327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory thresholds and cochlear microphonics from the same guinea pigs. Walloch RA; Taylor-Spikes M J Aud Res; 1977 Jul; 17(3):145-54. PubMed ID: 617343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The application of a capacitive probe technique for direct observation of electromechanical processes in the guinea pig cochlea. LePage EL J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):126-38. PubMed ID: 3624634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Work experience in recording cochlear potentials with the use of glass microelectrodes]. Prazhma I Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1969; 31(4):71-6. PubMed ID: 5377965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Chlorpromazine alters cochlear mechanics and amplification: in vivo evidence for a role of stiffness modulation in the organ of corti. Zheng J; Deo N; Zou Y; Grosh K; Nuttall AL J Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 97(2):994-1004. PubMed ID: 17122316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical tuning and amplification within the apex of the guinea pig cochlea. Recio-Spinoso A; Oghalai JS J Physiol; 2017 Jul; 595(13):4549-4561. PubMed ID: 28382742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Production of cochlear potentials by inner and outer hair cells. Dallos P; Cheatham MA J Acoust Soc Am; 1976 Aug; 60(2):510-2. PubMed ID: 993471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Dependence of the cochlear microphonics and the summating potential on the endocochlear potential. Honrubia V; Ward PH J Acoust Soc Am; 1969 Aug; 46(2):388-92. PubMed ID: 5804109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]