These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 482028)
1. Role of contextual cues in determining transfer of oddity rule in children. Maruno S Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Jun; 48(3 Pt 1):775-81. PubMed ID: 482028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tactual learning and cross-modal transfer of an oddity problem in young children. Krekling S; Tellevik JM; Nordvik H J Exp Child Psychol; 1989 Feb; 47(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 2918276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oddity learning in developmentally delayed children: facilitation by means of familiar stimuli. Bryant JT; Deckner CW; Soraci SA; Baumeister AA; Blanton RL Am J Ment Retard; 1988 Sep; 93(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 3166801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: a comparison of children and adults. Minda JP; Desroches AS; Church BA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1518-33. PubMed ID: 18980411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Children's performance on "animal tests" of oddity: implications for cognitive processes required for tests of oddity and delayed nonmatch to sample. Overman W; Bachevalier J; Miller M; Moore K J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Jul; 62(2):223-42. PubMed ID: 8683187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transfer between the oddity and relative size concepts: reversal and extradimensional shifts. Brown AL; Scott MS J Exp Child Psychol; 1972 Apr; 13(2):350-67. PubMed ID: 5028284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Learning processes in matching and oddity: the oddity preference effect and sample reinforcement. Wright AA; Delius JD J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 16248729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Group differences and individual classification accuracy associated with letter/word oddity problems. Scott MS; Greenfield DB; Partridge MF; Gold S Am J Ment Retard; 1991 Jan; 95(4):404-16. PubMed ID: 2003910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attentional functioning and relational learning. Soraci SA; Deckner CW; Baumeister AA; Carlin MT Am J Ment Retard; 1990 Nov; 95(3):304-15. PubMed ID: 2261163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A limitation on the law of effect. House BJ; Hanley MJ; Magid DF Am J Ment Defic; 1979 Sep; 84(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 495659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence of a transition from perceptual to category induction in 3- to 9-year-old children. Badger JR; Shapiro LR J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Sep; 113(1):131-46. PubMed ID: 22726257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptual distinctiveness and oddity-problem solving in children. Gollin ES; Saravo A; Salten C J Exp Child Psychol; 1967 Dec; 5(4):586-96. PubMed ID: 6080289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of perceptual cues for number judgment by young children. Smither SJ; Smiley SS; Rees R Child Dev; 1974 Sep; 45(3):693-9. PubMed ID: 4143825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of identity versus Oddity pretraining on symmetric matching to sample. Boelens H; Schenk J Psychol Rep; 2009 Jun; 104(3):861-73. PubMed ID: 19708413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Facilitating mentally retarded children's relational learning through novelty-familiarity training. Greenfield DB Am J Ment Defic; 1985 Nov; 90(3):342-8. PubMed ID: 4083314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conceptual rule learning in normal and learning disabled children. Swanson L J Gen Psychol; 1980 Apr; 102(2d Half):255-63. PubMed ID: 7381441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationships between perceptual and conceptual mediational systems in young children. Gollin ES; Garrison A J Exp Child Psychol; 1980 Oct; 30(2):325-35. PubMed ID: 7430947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Colorful success: preschoolers' use of perceptual color cues to solve a spatial reasoning problem. Joh AS; Spivey LA J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Dec; 113(4):523-34. PubMed ID: 22878085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acquisition of concepts by TMR children as a function of type of modeling, rule verbalization, and observer gender. Litrownik AJ; Franzini LR; Turner GL Am J Ment Defic; 1976 May; 80(6):620-8. PubMed ID: 961726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of irrelevant stimulus dimensions on children's oddity-problem learning. Lubker BJ; Spiker CC J Exp Child Psychol; 1966 May; 3(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 5939112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]