These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 482048)

  • 21. Identification of letters in the predesignated target paradigm: a word superiority effect for the common word the.
    Peterzell DH; Sinclair GP; Healy AF; Bourne LE
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(3):299-315. PubMed ID: 2221192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interaction between two letters in visual perception.
    Budohoska W; Grabowska A; Jablonowska K
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1975; 35(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 1180133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings.
    Massaro DW; Venezky RL; Taylor GA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Mar; 108(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 528895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Abstract letter identities and developmental dyslexia.
    Bigsby P
    Br J Psychol; 1990 May; 81 ( Pt 2)():227-63. PubMed ID: 2364248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing the influence of letter position in reading normal and transposed texts using a letter detection task.
    Guérard K; Saint-Aubin J; Poirier M; Demetriou C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Dec; 66(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 22686154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual detection of multi-letter patterns.
    Staller JD; Lappin JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Dec; 7(6):1258-72. PubMed ID: 6458650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Orthographic transparency modulates the grain size of orthographic processing: behavioral and ERP evidence from bilingualism.
    Lallier M; Carreiras M; Tainturier MJ; Savill N; Thierry G
    Brain Res; 2013 Apr; 1505():47-60. PubMed ID: 23419894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of interletter spacing in visual-word recognition.
    Perea M; Moret-Tatay C; Gómez P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jul; 137(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 21545978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On the role of word frequency in the detection of component letters.
    Johnson NF; Allen PA; Strand TL
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):474-82. PubMed ID: 2761405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identification of tachistoscopically presented consonant-vowel syllables.
    Chermak GD; Borneman HJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Oct; 57(2):415-21. PubMed ID: 6634323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adult age differences in the effects of sentence context and stimulus degradation during visual word recognition.
    Madden DJ
    Psychol Aging; 1988 Jun; 3(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 3268255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ease of identifying words degraded by visual noise.
    Barber P; de la Mahotière C
    Br J Psychol; 1982 Aug; 73 (Pt 3)():371-81. PubMed ID: 7116083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Phonological access to the mental lexicon in a target discrimination task.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1984 Jan; 110(1st Half):53-60. PubMed ID: 6699627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
    Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of sequence and variety of irrelevant items on visual search.
    Marken R; Pettersen J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Aug; 49(1):315-8. PubMed ID: 503753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The visual processor module and normal adult readers.
    Bigsby P
    Br J Psychol; 1988 Nov; 79 ( Pt 4)():455-69. PubMed ID: 3208001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On time differences in searching for letters in words and nonwords: do they emerge during the initial encoding or the subsequent scan?
    Johnson NF; Carnot MJ
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 2314225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Familiarity effects and word unitization in visual comparison tasks.
    Marmurek HH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 2761406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hemisphericity style, sex, and performance on a letter-detection task.
    Roig M; Ryan R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Dec; 77(3 Pt 1):831-4. PubMed ID: 8284162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.