These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4821834)

  • 1. Equal loudness pressures determined with a decaying oscillatory waveform.
    Victoreen JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1974 Feb; 55(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 4821834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sound quality characteristics of refrigerator noise in real living environments with relation to psychoacoustical and autocorrelation function parameters.
    Sato S; You J; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):314-25. PubMed ID: 17614491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subjective loudness level measurements and equal loudness contours in a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus).
    Finneran JJ; Schlundt CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3124-36. PubMed ID: 22087941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Continuous loudness response to acoustic intensity dynamics in melodies: effects of melodic contour, tempo, and tonality.
    Olsen KN; Stevens CJ; Dean RT; Bailes F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():117-28. PubMed ID: 24809252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds - perception by normal hearing subjects.
    Skagerstrand Å; Köbler S; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):775-783. PubMed ID: 28485649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The difference of spectral composition of a sound stimulus and the velocity of its movement in the vertical plane].
    Agaeva MIu; Nikitin NI
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2003; 29(3):16-21. PubMed ID: 12845777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory subliminal stimulation: methods.
    Urban M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Jun; 76(3 Pt 2):1103-6. PubMed ID: 8337054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Loudness of complex sounds as a function of the standard stimulus and the number of components.
    Florentine M; Buus S; Bonding P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Oct; 64(4):1036-40. PubMed ID: 744827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The perception of complex signals by cats under free behavioral conditions].
    Kalmykova IV
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1989 Sep; 75(9):1194-9. PubMed ID: 2599130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Loudness and auditory steady-state responses in normal-hearing subjects.
    Zenker Castro F; Barajas de Prat JJ; Larumbe Zabala E
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):269-75. PubMed ID: 18465411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of tone alternations on sequential information processing by educable retardates.
    Holden EA; Appelbaum AG
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):1107-12. PubMed ID: 4418732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Near-threshold equal-loudness contours for harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) derived from reaction times during underwater audiometry: a preliminary study.
    Kastelein RA; Wensveen PJ; Terhune JM; de Jong CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):488-95. PubMed ID: 21303029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of auditory enhancement on the loudness of masker and target components.
    Wang N; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():150-156. PubMed ID: 26805025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the relation between the growth of loudness and the discrimination of intensity for pure tones.
    Hellman R; Scharf B; Teghtsoonian M; Teghtsoonian R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Aug; 82(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 3624649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The differential effect of low- versus high-frequency random noise stimulation in the treatment of tinnitus.
    Joos K; De Ridder D; Vanneste S
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 May; 233(5):1433-40. PubMed ID: 25694243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Appreciation of approaching and departing sources of natural acoustic signals].
    Kozhevnikova EV
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1987 Apr; 73(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 3609376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Letter: Square-wave stimuli and neonatal auditory behavior: reply to Bench.
    Hutt SJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1973 Dec; 16(3):530-3. PubMed ID: 4771435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychophysical evaluation of auditory signals in passenger vehicles.
    Chi CF; Dewi RS; Huang MH
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Mar; 59(Pt A):153-164. PubMed ID: 27890123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating signal-to-noise ratios, loudness, and related measures as indicators of airborne sound insulation.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1219-30. PubMed ID: 19739735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.