These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4822077)
1. [Hysterography in intrauterine contraception]. Nesit V Cesk Gynekol; 1974 Feb; 39(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 4822077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The significance of superimposed hysterography in intrauterine contraception]. Havránek F; Dvorák K; Valenta M Z Geburtshilfe Gynakol; 1969 Apr; 170(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 5784884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Relationship between the size and shape of intrauterine device and the uterine cavity as observed by superimposition hysterography]. Havránek F; Valenta M; Dvorák K Cesk Gynekol; 1967 Apr; 32(3):232-4. PubMed ID: 5626429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Hysterography findings following pregnancies with IUD in situ--a retrospective study]. Katzorke T; Tauber PF; Nohlen M; Propping D Arch Gynecol; 1979 Jul; 228(1-4):645. PubMed ID: 485536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Endometrial biopsy and hysterography prior to IUD insertion (author's transl)]. Delcroix M; Querleu D; Prevost A; Delahousse G; Decocq J; Crepin G Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1979 Dec; 12():879-83. PubMed ID: 12309645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uterine perforation with the Lippes loop. Detection by hysterography. Dhall K; Dhall GI; Gupta BB Obstet Gynecol; 1969 Aug; 34(2):266-70. PubMed ID: 5798273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic and therapeutic advantage of IUD's in inborn and post-traumatic uterine anomalies. Danezis J; Soumplis A; Papathanassiou Z Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1979 Apr; 7(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 12309448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Pregnancy following intrauterine contraception]. Kohoutek M; Vácha K Cesk Gynekol; 1967 Apr; 32(3):246-8. PubMed ID: 6083003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Should hysterography always be used before IUD insertion?]. Kahn-nathan J Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1975 Aug; 3(5):346. PubMed ID: 12143541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The size and shape of the uterine cavity determined by hysterography with an intrauterine contraceptive device as a marker. Burnhill MS; Birnberg CH Int J Fertil; 1966; 11(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 5957246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Hysterosalpingographic findings in cases of pregnancy existing despite intrauterine contraceptive devices]. Sternadel Z; Peksa A Wiad Lek; 1972 Apr; 25(8):677-82. PubMed ID: 5024971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Complication of erroneous application of an IUD. Rapid hysterographic resolution of diagnostic problems]. Arrotta U; Casati G Minerva Ginecol; 1983 Sep; 35(9):601-3. PubMed ID: 6686296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiographic assessment following insertion of 4 types of IUDs: geometric considerations and post-removal fertility. Ros A Contracept Deliv Syst; 1980 Apr; 1(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 12336240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Relationship between the size and form of intrauterine devices and the cavum uteri examined by the method of double x-ray picture demonstration]. Havránek F; Valenta M; Dvorák K Gynakol Rundsch; 1967; 4(3):169-71. PubMed ID: 5628651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Transposition of intrauterine devices into the abdominal cavity]. Briones H; Marquez J; Assis A; Ernst A Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1969; 34(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 5394108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Extrauterine location of a Majzlin intrauterine device. Porter GS; Wambo JM J Indiana State Med Assoc; 1972 May; 65(5):422-3. PubMed ID: 5032982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Intrauterine devices "lost" in the abdomen. Apropos of 10 cases]. Chelli H; Bel Hadj A; Zouari Touhami F; Chelli M Tunis Med; 1984; 62(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 6396917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]