These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4824301)

  • 1. The effect of level of depth processing and degree of informational discrepancy on adaptation to uniocular image magnification.
    Epstein W; Morgan-Paap CL
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Apr; 102(4):585-94. PubMed ID: 4824301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention of adaptation to uniocular image magnification: effect of interpolated activity.
    Epstein W
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Mar; 92(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 5060704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal input rates for tilt adaptation.
    Ebenholtz SM
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 86(1):193-200. PubMed ID: 4742385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aniseikonia. I. The influence of the magnification percentage of afocal meridional lenses on the magnitude of the stereoscopic depth effect.
    van der Meer HC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1974 Aug; 38(4):283-302. PubMed ID: 4412029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research on adaptation to rearranged vision: 1966-1974.
    Welch RB
    Perception; 1974; 3(4):367-92. PubMed ID: 4618343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aniseikonia. II. The influence of vertical and horizontal aniseikonia on the orientation of longitudinal horopters.
    van der Meer HC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1974 Aug; 38(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 4412030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptation to uniocular image magnification after varying preadaptation activities.
    Epstein W
    Am J Psychol; 1971 Mar; 84(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 5550528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemispheric asymmetries in tachistoscopic information-processing.
    White MJ
    Br J Psychol; 1972 Nov; 63(4):497-508. PubMed ID: 4574450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception.
    Weintraub DJ
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1975; 26():263-89. PubMed ID: 1094929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptation to uniocular image magnification: modification of the disparity-depth relationship.
    Epstein W; Morgan CL
    Am J Psychol; 1970 Sep; 83(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 5478852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The process of 'taking-into-account' in visual perception.
    Epstein W
    Perception; 1973; 2(3):267-85. PubMed ID: 4794124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial organization of binocular disparity sensitivity.
    Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 1975 May; 15(5):583-90. PubMed ID: 1136171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Directed attention and maladaptive "adaptation" to displacement of the visual field.
    Canon LK
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 Jun; 88(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 5090930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stimulus pairing in sequential phi motion.
    Lee DN
    Perception; 1972; 1(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 4680928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of cognitive factors on adaptation to prismatic displacement.
    Uhlarik JJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 May; 98(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 4705623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of adaptation to stereoscopic depth and to uniocular image magnification on the duration of short-term visual storage.
    Van der Meer HC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1976 Aug; 40(4):311-23. PubMed ID: 970202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optics, the eye, and the brain.
    Riggs LA
    J Opt Soc Am; 1983 Jun; 73(6):736-41. PubMed ID: 6875699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of stimulus alternation on sequential information processing by retarded and nonretarded subjects.
    Holden EA
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Dec; 101(2):262-8. PubMed ID: 4753855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of task, selection set, and dispersion of attention on visual identification time.
    Schioldborg P; Paus E; Myhre G
    Scand J Psychol; 1973; 14(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 4759282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is a theory of direct visual perception adequate?
    Gyr JW
    Psychol Bull; 1972 Apr; 77(4):246-61. PubMed ID: 5017819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.