These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4824939)

  • 1. Editorial: Attitudes to abortion.
    Br Med J; 1974 Apr; 2(5910):69-70. PubMed ID: 4824939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Editorial: Polarization of attitudes.
    Br Med J; 1975 Mar; 1(5959):648. PubMed ID: 1125652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion Act in Somerset.
    Jones AP; Grimoldby MR
    Br Med J; 1973 Jul; 3(5871):90-2. PubMed ID: 4717850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abortion and the NHS.
    Noble A
    Br Med J; 1979 Feb; 1(6162):554. PubMed ID: 444897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consultants' report on abortion.
    Br Med J; 1970 May; 2(5708):491-2. PubMed ID: 5428708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Therapeutic abortion in Great Britain.
    Pond DA
    Semin Psychiatry; 1970 Aug; 2(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 5527401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The general practitioner and the Abortion Act.
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1972 Aug; 22(121):543-6. PubMed ID: 4343417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Letter: Attitudes to abortions.
    Br Med J; 1974 Jun; 2(5917):501. PubMed ID: 4834110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Editorial: After Lane.
    Lancet; 1974 Apr; 1(7860):715-6. PubMed ID: 4132429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Abortion Act (1967). Findings of an inquiry into the first year's working of the Act conducted by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
    Br Med J; 1970 May; 2(5708):529-35. PubMed ID: 5428720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overpopulation in developed societies.
    Gifford PW
    Clin Endocrinol Metab; 1973 Nov; 2(3):561-76. PubMed ID: 4544242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Editorial: Bad to worse.
    Lancet; 1975 Mar; 1(7908):671. PubMed ID: 47090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New York's obstetricians surveyed on abortion.
    Lerner RC; Arnold CB; Wassertheil S
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Jan; 3(1):56. PubMed ID: 5098778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical disability and professional and public attitudes.
    Rosenheim
    Proc R Soc Med; 1973 Feb; 66(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 4268396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Letter: Select committee on abortion.
    Lancet; 1976 Aug; 2(7980):306. PubMed ID: 59872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion or no? What decides? An inquiry by questionnaire into the attitudes of gynecologists and psychiatrists in Aberdeen.
    McCance C; McCance PF
    Semin Psychiatry; 1970 Aug; 2(3):352-60. PubMed ID: 5527403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion and the unwanted child.
    Guttmacher AF; Pilpel HF
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1970 Mar; 2(2):16-24. PubMed ID: 5520624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Professional and public opinion on abortion law proposals.
    Facer W
    N Z Nurs Forum; 1978 Mar; 6(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 274614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Editorial: Dangerous fever.
    Lancet; 1974 Nov; 2(7890):1184-5. PubMed ID: 4139598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. By the London post. More friction in the hospitals--doctors' and nurses' roles--true story.
    Lister J
    N Engl J Med; 1975 Jan; 292(5):252-4. PubMed ID: 1110693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.