These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
10. The Abortion Act (1967). Findings of an inquiry into the first year's working of the Act conducted by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Br Med J; 1970 May; 2(5708):529-35. PubMed ID: 5428720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Editorial: Bad to worse. Lancet; 1975 Mar; 1(7908):671. PubMed ID: 47090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New York's obstetricians surveyed on abortion. Lerner RC; Arnold CB; Wassertheil S Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Jan; 3(1):56. PubMed ID: 5098778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Physical disability and professional and public attitudes. Rosenheim Proc R Soc Med; 1973 Feb; 66(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 4268396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion or no? What decides? An inquiry by questionnaire into the attitudes of gynecologists and psychiatrists in Aberdeen. McCance C; McCance PF Semin Psychiatry; 1970 Aug; 2(3):352-60. PubMed ID: 5527403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Professional and public opinion on abortion law proposals. Facer W N Z Nurs Forum; 1978 Mar; 6(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 274614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. By the London post. More friction in the hospitals--doctors' and nurses' roles--true story. Lister J N Engl J Med; 1975 Jan; 292(5):252-4. PubMed ID: 1110693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]