These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4825815)

  • 1. Letter: On the use of audio tape cassettes in speech audiometry.
    Niemoeller AF; Harrison CE; Grason RL
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1974 May; 39(2):229-30. PubMed ID: 4825815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between the calibration tone and speech volume unit (VU) levels for some commercially available test tapes.
    Edgerton BJ; Beattie RC; Helmerich LF
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(5):280-3. PubMed ID: 7141143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of compact disk recording protocols on reliability and comparability of speech audiometry outcomes: acoustic analysis.
    Di Berardino F; Tognola G; Paglialonga A; Alpini D; Grandori F; Cesarani A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Aug; 124(8):859-63. PubMed ID: 20441674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital audio tape as a method of storing Doppler ultrasound signals.
    Bush G; Evans DH
    Physiol Meas; 1993 Aug; 14(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 8401278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A portable diagnostic speech audiometry unit.
    Hooker P; Hoops RA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1969 Aug; 34(3):251-3. PubMed ID: 5821128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of the efficiency of the verbal auditory screening for children (VASC).
    Ritchie BC; Merklein RA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1972 Jun; 15(2):280-6. PubMed ID: 5047865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The concept of a portable and programmable tape-recorder equipment for use with electric-response audiometry.
    Krogh HJ
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1977 Mar; 15(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 192963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory analysis of temporally distorted sentential approximations.
    Beasley DS; Shriner TH
    Audiology; 1973; 12(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 4722025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech audiometry. Tape versus disc recording.
    Hughes RL; Scott RJ
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1967 Aug; 86(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 6029342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Earmold influence on aided speech identification tasks.
    Northern JL; Hattler KW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1970 Mar; 13(1):162-72. PubMed ID: 5421128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using simultaneous nasometry and standard audio recordings to detect the acoustic onsets and offsets of speech.
    Seaver EJ; Dalston RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):358-62. PubMed ID: 2359276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An investigation of the Auditec of St. Louis recordings of the Central Institute for the Deaf spondees.
    Beattie RC; Edgerton BJ; Svihovec DV
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1975; 1(3):97-101. PubMed ID: 1228167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of loudspeaker position on differences between earphone and free-field thresholds (MAP and MAF).
    Stream RW; Dirks DD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Dec; 17(4):549-68. PubMed ID: 4444278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arabic speech audiometry.
    Alusi HA; Hinchcliffe R; Ingham B; Knight JJ; North C
    Audiology; 1974; 13(3):212-30. PubMed ID: 4412077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A device for recording speech on audiograms.
    Bellefleur PA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1968 May; 33(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 5652620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech recognition shortens the recording time of prehospital medical documentation.
    Shimazui T; Nakada TA; Kuroiwa S; Toyama Y; Oda S
    Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Nov; 49():414-416. PubMed ID: 33663896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SNAP: a computer language for control of psychoacoustic experiments.
    Moody DB
    Comput Biomed Res; 1972 Dec; 5(6):673-83. PubMed ID: 4566954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standardization of slant-track video-tape recorders.
    Snell EC
    Med Biol Illus; 1970 Jul; 20(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 5432684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech audiometry: taped vs live voice.
    Creston JE; Gillespie M; Krohn C
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1966 Jan; 83(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 4158742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of tape recording on perturbation measures.
    Jiang J; Lin E; Hanson DG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Oct; 41(5):1031-41. PubMed ID: 9771626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.