These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4826380)

  • 41. [Radiation-protection problems in the gynecologic contact therapy departments].
    Reichel G; Weise W
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1971 Aug; 93(33):1132-46. PubMed ID: 5165255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Misconceptions about protective aprons.
    Shymko M
    Radiol Technol; 2002; 73(5):484-5. PubMed ID: 12048989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A simple solution to prevent the loss of radioactive spot markers.
    Hackett MT; Wierzbinski RS
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2000 Mar; 28(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 10763781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Radiation safety of patients in pediatric roentgenology].
    Kal'nitskiĭ SA; Kirko NI; Maksimova TA
    Gig Sanit; 1983 Jan; (1):66-70. PubMed ID: 6337930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Radiation exposure of patients and radiologic personnel during cardiac catheterization and contrast medium demonstration of the heart and great vessels. II. Measurement by an apparatus for a biplanar picture series in a large film size and 1 cassette changer. Exposure to dispersed radiation in the examiner with protective clothing].
    Schulte-Brinkmann W
    Strahlentherapie; 1966 Feb; 129(2):295-307. PubMed ID: 5984063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [The exposure to x-rays of patients and radiological personnel by heart soundings as well as contrast media display of the heart and the great blood vessels. I. Introduction--methods--measurements on a device for image intensifier-television x-ray screening and image intensifier-cinematography].
    Schulte-Brinkmann W
    Strahlentherapie; 1966 Jan; 129(1):139-55. PubMed ID: 5983025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Malfunctioning and emergencies and corrective measures].
    Henseler H; Zimmer R
    Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1974; 14():178-83. PubMed ID: 4458135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Concepts and nomenclature in radiologic technic: radiation protection].
    Frik W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1970 Apr; 112(4):546-56. PubMed ID: 5535106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [A device for cutting and milling of styrodur for the use in radiation therapy (author's transl)].
    Brix F
    Strahlentherapie; 1981 Apr; 157(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 7245268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Radiation dose to the radiologist's hand during continuous CT fluoroscopy-guided interventions.
    Stoeckelhuber BM; Leibecke T; Schulz E; Melchert UH; Bergmann-Koester CU; Helmberger T; Gellissen J
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2005; 28(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 16132384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Radiation protection of personnel during paediatric radiodiagnostic examination.
    Pritchard C
    Radiography; 1980 Jul; 46(547):165-9. PubMed ID: 7433655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A tennis-racket shielding-block tray with adjustable tension.
    Williamson TJ
    Radiology; 1973 Sep; 108(3):712. PubMed ID: 4723678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [PHYSICAL AND TECHNICAL POSSIBILITIES FOR IMPROVING ROENTGEN IMAGE INTENSIFICATION].
    KELLER M
    Elektromed Biomed Tech; 1964 Mar; 9():1-12. PubMed ID: 14184836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [The use of a protective shield in the gonadal region in radiologic examinations].
    Polikovskiĭ VV
    Voen Med Zh; 1966 Nov; 11():82-3. PubMed ID: 6001986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Experiences with a remote controlled x-ray diagnostic device].
    Witt H
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1967 May; 106(5):739-43. PubMed ID: 5626835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparative study of radiation doses received during examinations with the pantomograph, orthopantomograph, Panorex, Status-X and conventional roentgen apparatus.
    Altonen M; Heikkilä M; Mattila K
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1974 Apr; 70(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 4831509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An effective fluoroscopic shield for angiographic equipment.
    Malott JC; Fodor J
    Radiol Technol; 1983; 54(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 6836110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Protection of the patient against radiations. Apparatus for radiodiagnosis. Technical principles and their contributions in protection of patients against radiations].
    Bleukx B
    J Belge Radiol; 1971; 54(6):715-9. PubMed ID: 5145142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Radiation protection technic].
    Drexler G; Göttel K
    Radiologe; 1966 Aug; 6(8):327-31. PubMed ID: 5987594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of non-lead-based protective radiological material in spinal surgery.
    Scuderi GJ; Brusovanik GV; Campbell DR; Henry RP; Kwon B; Vaccaro AR
    Spine J; 2006; 6(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 16934731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.