107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4826952)
1. Evaluation of a transformation method for estimation of normal range.
Reed AH; Wu GT
Clin Chem; 1974 May; 20(5):576-81. PubMed ID: 4826952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Simplified estimation of normal ranges from routine laboratory data.
Becktel JM
Clin Chim Acta; 1970 Apr; 28(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 5440276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A computer program for estimation of reference percentile values in laboratory data.
Rossing RG; Hatcher WE
Comput Programs Biomed; 1979 Jan; 9(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 365438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer analysis of quality control data.
Conn RB; Best ML; Anido V; Crain FD
Am J Clin Pathol; 1967 Oct; 48(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 6053932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Problems of modern diagnosis].
Immich H; Kübler W; Oette K; Schumacher K
Methods Inf Med; 1967 Jan; 6(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 6043323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality control techniques in laboratory services.
Whitehead TP
Br Med Bull; 1974 Sep; 30(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 4458900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Techniques of orthomolecular diagnosis.
Robinson AB; Pauling L
Clin Chem; 1974 Aug; 20(8):961-5. PubMed ID: 4854609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. EVALUATION OF LABORATORY TESTS FOR THE ESTIMATION OF CARIES ACTIVITY.
SNYDER ML; PORTER DR; CLAYCOMB CK; SIMS W; MACHO FR
Arch Oral Biol; 1963 Jul; 8():541-7. PubMed ID: 14047595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of laboratory error on the normal range: a Bayesian model.
Krause RD; Anand VD; Gruemer HD; Willke TA
Clin Chem; 1975 Mar; 21(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 1112041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ABC of computing. Patient administration--II.
Ingram JA; Asbury AJ
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Sep; 287(6393):667-70. PubMed ID: 6411274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. THE CONCEPT OF THE NORMAL RANGE IN CLINICAL CHEMISTRY.
KEYSER JW
Postgrad Med J; 1965 Jul; 41(477):443-7. PubMed ID: 14344589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two platelet count estimation methodologies for peripheral blood smears.
Malok M; Titchener EH; Bridgers C; Lee BY; Bamberg R
Clin Lab Sci; 2007; 20(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 17691671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The "normal" range.
Pryce JD
JAMA; 1970 May; 212(5):883-4. PubMed ID: 5467390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Laboratory tests: basic concepts and realistic expectations.
Burke MD
Postgrad Med; 1978 Apr; 63(4):53-5, 58, 60. PubMed ID: 634868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A computer program for estimating LD50 and its confidence limits using modified Behrens-Reed-Muench cumulant method.
Thakur AK; Fezio WL
Drug Chem Toxicol; 1981; 4(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 7338208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of biological data using nonparametric estimation of the average difference on the TI-59 calculator].
Klemera P; Veselá J; Drsata J
Cesk Fysiol; 1985; 34(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 4017008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Computers, statistics and quality control].
Lewin D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1980; 9(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 7451872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC TESTS: THE CONCEPT OF INVERSE PROBABILITY.
KANNER O
N C Med J; 1965 Aug; 26():321-8. PubMed ID: 14341188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Establishing normal values.
Beeler MF
Postgrad Med; 1968 Apr; 43(4):67-9. PubMed ID: 5648648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Normal values in medicine.
Mainland D
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1969 Sep; 161(2):527-37. PubMed ID: 4902352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
