These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Proposed revisions of Guidelines for Identification Audiometry. ASHA; 1984 Feb; 26(2):47-50. PubMed ID: 6704203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidence of responses at the lower audiometric limits. Halpin C Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 18056877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ambient noise levels in mobile audiometric testing facilities: compliance with industry standards. Lankford JE; Perrone DC; Thunder TD AAOHN J; 1999 Apr; 47(4):163-7. PubMed ID: 10418346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relationship of audiometric thresholds elicited with pulsed, warbled, and pulsed-warbled tones in adults with normal hearing. Franklin C; Johnson K; Smith-Olinde L; Nicholson N Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 19390442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of circumaural earphones in audiometry. Report No. 450. Harris JD Rep US Nav Submar Med Cent; 1968 Jul; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 5305447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. American National Standard specifications for audiometers. Melnick W ASHA; 1971 Apr; 13(4):203-6. PubMed ID: 5550370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Design and standardization of a portable audiometric booth. Bhattacharya SK; Roy A; Pancholy M; Chatterjee SK Indian J Med Res; 1982 Jun; 75():899-906. PubMed ID: 7129566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. WC hearing loss claims should be handled with care. Sataloff J Occup Health Saf; 1984 Mar; ():35-6, 47. PubMed ID: 6231500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Current trends in audiometric practices. Martin FN; Pennington CD ASHA; 1971 Nov; 13(11):671-7. PubMed ID: 5126086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Training of industrial audiometric technicians. Maas R; Michael P; Murphy A; Sataloff J J Occup Med; 1966 Sep; 8(9):493-4. PubMed ID: 5945643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Certificate Program for Otolaryngology Personnel (CPOP): A good solution for many practice challenges. Sataloff RT Ear Nose Throat J; 2006 Aug; 85(8):468, 470. PubMed ID: 16999045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comfortable loudness judgments for discrete frequency signals. Berger KW; Harrison LD; Monack N; Ferren GE J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 7345058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Audiometric testing: review of audiograms and worker referral. Morrill JC Occup Health Saf; 1984 Oct; 53(9):64-7. PubMed ID: 6504439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pass-fail ratios in identification audiometry as a function of audiometer rise time. Walton WK; Wilson WR J Acoust Soc Am; 1974 Aug; 56(2):601-4. PubMed ID: 4414991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Does your audiometric monitoring program measure up? Gasaway DC Occup Health Saf; 1995 Apr; 64(4):58-61. PubMed ID: 7724164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]