These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The coordination of manipulation and visual fixation: a response to Schaffer (1975). Ruff HA Child Dev; 1976 Sep; 47(3):868-71. PubMed ID: 1001086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accelerating visual complexity levels in the human infant. Greenberg DJ Child Dev; 1971 Sep; 42(3):905-18. PubMed ID: 5121105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual search through short digit sequences is self terminating. Kinsbourne M; Innis N Acta Psychol (Amst); 1972 Feb; 36(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 5061263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reinvestigation of perception of error in 7-letter targets. Fudin R; Wenger RT Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Feb; 36(1):299-302. PubMed ID: 4686724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast sensitivity function of the infant visual system. Banks MS; Salapatek P Vision Res; 1976; 16(8):867-9. PubMed ID: 960614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of target luminance and cue validity on the latency of visual detection. Hawkins HL; Shafto MG; Richardson K Percept Psychophys; 1988 Nov; 44(5):484-92. PubMed ID: 3226899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Some evidence for a selfterminating process in simple visual search tasks. Van Der Heijden AH; Menckenberg HW Acta Psychol (Amst); 1974 Jun; 38(3):169-81. PubMed ID: 4415821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual masking, handedness, and laterality. Luria SM Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):803-11. PubMed ID: 4842435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The time course of lateral asymmetries in visual perception of letters. Wilkins A; Stewart A J Exp Psychol; 1974 May; 102(5):905-8. PubMed ID: 4847740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic form perception in the bending hourglass: effects of contrast reversal and visual persistence. Walker JT; Frechmann TD Percept Psychophys; 1989 Mar; 45(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 2710621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The psychological refractory period and the effect of stimulus discriminability. Tolkmitt FJ; Lunn SE Am J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 86(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 4742381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual preferences of Down's syndrome and normal infants. Miranda SB; Fantz RL Child Dev; 1973 Sep; 44(3):555-61. PubMed ID: 4269813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Eye fixations and latency in a simplified search situation. Volkmann FC; Volkmann J Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Dec; 33(3):971-9. PubMed ID: 5127218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Interhemispheric effects on choice reaction times to one-, two-, and three-letter displays. Umiltá C; Frost N; Hyman R J Exp Psychol; 1972 Apr; 93(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 5013334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. PREFERENCE FOR SHAPES OF INTERMEDIATE VARIABILITY IN THE NEWBORN HUMAN. HERSHENSON M; MUNSINGER H; KESSEN W Science; 1965 Feb; 147(3658):630-1. PubMed ID: 14241417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Infant visual acuity is underestimated because near threshold gratings are not preferentially fixated. Held R; Gwiazda J; Brill S; Mohindra I; Wolfe J Vision Res; 1979; 19(12):1377-9. PubMed ID: 532103 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]