These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4833495)

  • 1. Differential GSR conditioning accompanied by a two-light prediction task.
    Hunt DP; Daily RF
    J Gen Psychol; 1974 Apr; 90(2d Half):165-77. PubMed ID: 4833495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive processes in differential GSR conditioning: effects of a masking task.
    Fuhrer MJ; Baer PE
    Am J Psychol; 1969 Jun; 82(2):168-80. PubMed ID: 5811180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An investigation of auditory dimensional interaction in a bivariate bilateral conditioning paradigm in the rabbit.
    Mauldin KN; Thomas RD; Berry SD; O'Brien WP; Hoedt CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3205-13. PubMed ID: 19425663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concurrent measurement of awareness and electrodermal classical conditioning.
    Dawson ME; Biferno MA
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Nov; 101(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 4759641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of CS duration on trace conditioning of mental retardates.
    Carruthers BC; Lobb H
    Psychol Rep; 1973 Jun; 32(3):1215-9. PubMed ID: 4709817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orienting responses and personality variables as predictors of differential conditioning of electrodermal responses and awareness of stimulus relations.
    Fuhrer MJ; Baer PE; Cowan CO
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1973 Aug; 27(2):287-96. PubMed ID: 4723975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential conditioning of electrodermal responses: effects of performing a masking task during the interstimulus and intertrial intervals.
    Wilson RA; Fuhrer MJ; Baer PE
    Biol Psychol; 1974; 2(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 4425718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of an unpleasant sound as an unconditional stimulus in a human aversive Pavlovian conditioning procedure.
    Neumann DL; Waters AM
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Aug; 73(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 16698165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of masking tasks on differential eyelid conditioning: a distinction between knowledge of stimulus contingencies and attentional or cognitive activities involving them.
    Nelson MN; Ross LE
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Jan; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 4809655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Backward masking of conditioned stimuli: effects on differential and single-cue classical conditioning performance.
    Ross LE; Ferreira MC; Ross SM
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Oct; 103(4):603-13. PubMed ID: 4448963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Behavioral and cognitive effects of violent stimuli.
    Geen RG
    Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis; 1974; 52():248-59. PubMed ID: 4431997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trace GSR conditioning with benzedrine in mentally defective and normal adults.
    Lobb H
    Am J Ment Defic; 1968 Sep; 73(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 5696174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On evaluating autonomic and verbal indices of negative preception.
    Furedy JJ; Klajner F
    Psychophysiology; 1974 Mar; 11(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 4595346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the validity of the preception hypothesis.
    Lykken DT; Tellegen A
    Psychophysiology; 1974 Mar; 11(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 4595347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of static background cues on classical fear conditioning.
    Goldstein ML
    J Gen Psychol; 1974 Jul; 91(1st Half):145-51. PubMed ID: 4418536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus compounding in free-operant and classical conditioning. A review and analysis.
    Weiss SJ
    Psychol Bull; 1972 Sep; 78(3):189-208. PubMed ID: 4560788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive factors in electrodermal conditioning.
    Grings WW
    Psychol Bull; 1973 Mar; 79(3):200-10. PubMed ID: 4570402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interaction between instruction-induced expectancy and strength of unconditioned stimulus in GSR conditioning.
    Ohman A
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 Jun; 88(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 5090928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Latent inhibition in the conditioned electrodermal response.
    Surwit RS; Poser EG
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1974 Mar; 86(3):543-8. PubMed ID: 4814770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the trace and delay classical conditioning performance of normal children.
    Werden D; Ross LE
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1972 Aug; 14(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 5052226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.