These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 483597)
1. The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays. Barlow HB; Reeves BC Vision Res; 1979; 19(7):783-93. PubMed ID: 483597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The statistical efficiency for detecting sinusoidal modulation of average dot density in random figures. van Meeteren A; Barlow HB Vision Res; 1981; 21(6):765-77. PubMed ID: 7314453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Rules for the perception of connectivity in random dot patterns. Santoro TP; Fender DH Vision Res; 1976; 16(9):973-81. PubMed ID: 948888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Infant visual acuity is underestimated because near threshold gratings are not preferentially fixated. Held R; Gwiazda J; Brill S; Mohindra I; Wolfe J Vision Res; 1979; 19(12):1377-9. PubMed ID: 532103 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The discrimination of orientation by young infants. Maurer D; Martello M Vision Res; 1980; 20(3):201-4. PubMed ID: 7385592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Apparent fineness of briefly presented gratings: balance between movement and pattern channels. Kulikowski JJ Vision Res; 1975 Jun; 15(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 1138483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of mirror symmetry in random dot patterns at different eccentricities. Saarinen J Vision Res; 1988; 28(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 3227652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Goodness of regularity in dot patterns: global symmetry, local symmetry, and their interactions. Nucci M; Wagemans J Perception; 2007; 36(9):1305-19. PubMed ID: 18196698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The efficiency of detecting changes of density in random dot patterns. Barlow HB Vision Res; 1978; 18(6):637-50. PubMed ID: 664351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The paired-comparison paradigm and infant intelligence. Fagan JF Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1990; 608():337-57; discussion 358-64. PubMed ID: 2075956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial probability summation and disinhibition in psychophysically measured line-spread functions. Wilson HR; Phillips G; Rentschler I; Hilz R Vision Res; 1979; 19(5):593-8. PubMed ID: 483588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Letter processing during eye fixations in visual search. Rayner K; Fisher DL Percept Psychophys; 1987 Jul; 42(1):87-100. PubMed ID: 3658641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Displacement limits, directional anisotropy and direction versus form discrimination in random-dot cinematograms. Chang JJ; Julesz B Vision Res; 1983; 23(6):639-46. PubMed ID: 6613004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hyperacuity in the detection of absolute and differential displacements of random dot patterns. Hadani I; Gur M; Meir AZ; Fender DH Vision Res; 1980; 20(11):947-51. PubMed ID: 7210521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence for feature perturbations from character misidentifications. Chastain G Percept Psychophys; 1986 Apr; 39(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 3737360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceiving words during reading: lack of facilitation from prior peripheral exposure. McConkie GW; Zola D; Blanchard HE; Wolverton GS Percept Psychophys; 1982 Sep; 32(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 7177765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Perception of random-dot symmetry and apparent movement at and near isoluminance. Troscianko T Vision Res; 1987; 27(4):547-54. PubMed ID: 3660617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Confusability and interference between members of parafoveal letter pairs. Chastain G Percept Psychophys; 1982 Dec; 32(6):576-80. PubMed ID: 7167357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]