These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Cochlear and cortical audiometry conveniently recorded in the same subject. Sohmer H; Feinmesser M Isr J Med Sci; 1970; 6(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 5506236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Automatic evaluation of ERA based on stochastic-ergodic conversion (SEC) (author's transl)]. Leitner H Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1975 Aug; 54(8):677-88. PubMed ID: 129639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Practical course in audiometry. 3. Deafness in threshold audiometry]. Niemeyer W HNO; 1970 Sep; 18(9):279-89. PubMed ID: 5513835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Some clinical aspects of electric response audiometry. John AC Practitioner; 1981 Nov; 225(1361):1611-6. PubMed ID: 7335590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Experience in the use of computerized audiometry in examinations for hypoacusis and deafness]. Tereshchuk TI; Pudov AI; Kraeva NI Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1984; (3):3-8. PubMed ID: 6730147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Audiometric examination in young children using the sound roundabout and musical audiometry]. Groen JJ Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1974; 28(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 4837377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Impedance audiometry: clinical application in the pediatric practice. Istre CO; King TD J La State Med Soc; 1975 May; 127(5):163-5. PubMed ID: 1151124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Various audiometry tests designated as objective]. Freyss G; Legent F Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1969 Mar; 86(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 5769827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Influence of the intensity of stimulation on evoked auditory potentials in normal subjects and in hypoacusia with recruitment]. Marco J; Ruíz Carmona E Acta Otorinolaryngol Iber Am; 1972; 23(2):181-8 passim. PubMed ID: 5077020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Screening test of hearing in young infants using the Neo-Meter]. Takagi J; Ito H; Okada T Jibiinkoka; 1970 Jun; 42(6):429-34. PubMed ID: 5465669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Audiometric examination in the infant]. Portmann M; Aran JN; Negrevergne M Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1974; 28(1):160-70. PubMed ID: 4837384 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Replacement of Stenger's test by a simple bone conduction test with a monocanal audiometer]. Depaepe E Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1972; 26(3):359-61. PubMed ID: 5048616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of middle latency response in the diagnosis of cortical deafness. Vedder JS; Barrs DM; Fifer RC Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1988 Apr; 98(4):333-7. PubMed ID: 3132689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]