These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 483894)
21. Are perceptual judgments dissociated from motor processes?--A prism adaptation study. Ferber S; Murray LJ Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):453-6. PubMed ID: 15820653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multiple sources of information and time-to-contact judgments. Kim NG; Grocki MJ Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1946-58. PubMed ID: 16469351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Feedback as a source of information and as a source of noise in absolute judgments of loudness. McNicol D J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 May; 104(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 1194868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Direct estimation considered within a comparative judgment framework. Smith J; Kaufman H; Baldasare J Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(3):343-58. PubMed ID: 6496808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Modification of psychophysical judgments as a method of reducing dissonance. Wilson PR; Russell PN J Pers Soc Psychol; 1966 Jun; 3(6):710-2. PubMed ID: 5939011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Perception of forces exerted by objects in collision events. White PA Psychol Rev; 2009 Jul; 116(3):580-601. PubMed ID: 19618988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. SCALING OF APPARENT VISCOSITY. STEVENS SS; GUIRAO M Science; 1964 May; 144(3622):1157-8. PubMed ID: 14148443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Anchor effects in category judgment of weight. Vuorinen R Scand J Psychol; 1973; 14(4):261-72. PubMed ID: 4772788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Apparent weight differences as a source of after-effects. Kolehmainen K; Mikkonen VV Scand J Psychol; 1970; 11(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 5525911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Higher order and lower order variables in the visual perception of relative pulling force. Michaels CF; de Vries MM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Apr; 24(2):526-46. PubMed ID: 9554096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Conjoint scaling of subjective number and weight. Rule SJ; Curtis DW J Exp Psychol; 1973 Mar; 97(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 4705240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Sensory and decision processes in anchor effects and aftereffects. McNicol D; Pennington CW J Exp Psychol; 1973 Oct; 100(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 4745454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Channel capacity in the magnitude estimation of weight. Fulgosi A; Bezinović P; Mimica I; Taksić V Percept Psychophys; 1987 Oct; 42(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 3684488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Response bias in psychophysical judgments: a test of Luce's model. VAN LAER J J Gen Psychol; 1962 Oct; 67():283-9. PubMed ID: 13996075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Weight of evidence supports one operation for "ratios" and "differences" of heaviness. Mellers BA; Davis DM; Birnbaum MH J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Apr; 10(2):216-30. PubMed ID: 6232341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Adaptation-level and theory of signal detection: an examination and integration of two judgment models for voluntary stimulus generalization. Hébert JA Acta Psychol (Amst); 1973 Mar; 37(1):15-29. PubMed ID: 4697158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of fixed versus variable reference frequencies on psychophysical judgments of vibration. Rao BK; Jones B Hum Factors; 1978 Feb; 20(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 640698 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Social modeling influences on psychophysical judgments of electrical stimulation. Craig KD; Best H; Ward LM J Abnorm Psychol; 1975 Aug; 84(4):366-73. PubMed ID: 1176713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Avector model for psychophysical judgment. Ross J; Di Lollo V J Exp Psychol; 1968 Jul; 77(3):Suppl 1:1-16. PubMed ID: 5666498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]