These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4841934)
1. Speaker identification from turbulent portions of fricatives. LaRiviere C Phonetica; 1974; 29(4):246-52. PubMed ID: 4841934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Multidimensional analysis of choice reaction time judgments on pairs of English fricatives. Weiner FF; Singh S J Exp Psychol; 1974 Apr; 102(4):615-20. PubMed ID: 4855492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Toward a theory of speech perception. Cole RA; Scott B Psychol Rev; 1974 Jul; 81(4):348-74. PubMed ID: 4607301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of words in whispered speech: The role of cues to fricatives' place and voicing. Jesus LMT; Ferreira JFS; Ferreira AJS JASA Express Lett; 2023 Aug; 3(8):. PubMed ID: 37555774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Severity of nasality in three selected speech tasks. Carney PJ; Sherman D J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):396-407. PubMed ID: 5558096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceived nasality in the speech of the deaf. Colton RH; Cooker HS J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Sep; 11(3):553-9. PubMed ID: 5722479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fluent and hesitation pauses as a function of syntactic complexity. Ruder KF; Jensen PJ J Speech Hear Res; 1972 Mar; 15(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 5012811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Verbal transformation on repeated listening to some English consonants. Clegg JM Br J Psychol; 1971 Aug; 62(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 5160434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Speaker recognition. An interpretive survey of the literature. Hecker MH ASHA Monogr; 1971 Jan; 16():1-103. PubMed ID: 4943814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds "L" and "R". Goto H Neuropsychologia; 1971 Sep; 9(3):317-23. PubMed ID: 5149302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Speaker-dependent characteristics of the nasals. Amino K; Arai T Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Mar; 185(1-3):21-8. PubMed ID: 19162417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consonant cue perception by twenty- to twenty-four-week-old infants. Moffitt AR Child Dev; 1971 Sep; 42(3):717-31. PubMed ID: 5121099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The perception of coarticulated emphaticness. Ali LH; Daniloff RG Phonetica; 1974; 29(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 4842861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. SEMANTIC COMPONENTS OF THE QUALITY OF PROCESSED SPEECH. MCGEE VE J Speech Hear Res; 1964 Dec; 7():310-23. PubMed ID: 14239010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Earwitness recall and identification: comparison of the cognitive interview and the structured interview. Memon A; Yarmey AD Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Jun; 88(3 Pt 1):797-807. PubMed ID: 10407887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship of articulatory defects to speech-sound identification. Monnin LM; Huntington DA J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Sep; 17(3):352-66. PubMed ID: 4424729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Contributions of fundamental frequency and formant frequencies to speaker identification. LaRivere C Phonetica; 1975; 31(3-4):185-97. PubMed ID: 1124262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Perception of reading rate by speakers and listeners. Lane H; Grosjean F J Exp Psychol; 1973 Feb; 97(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 4705233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The imitation of synthetic vowels and some implications for speech memory. Kent RD Phonetica; 1973; 28(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 4751546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]