342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 484218)
1. Evaluation of smears obtained by cervical scraping and an endocervical swab in the diagnosis of neoplastic disease of the uterine cervix.
Johansen P; Arffmann E; Pallesen G
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1979; 58(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 484218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the abnormal Pap smear.
Homesley HD
Am Fam Physician; 1977 Sep; 16(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 900003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The contribution of endocervical smears to cervical cancer detection.
Shingleton HM; Gore H; Austin JM; Littleton HJ; Straugin JM
Acta Cytol; 1975; 19(3):261-4. PubMed ID: 1096515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Review of cervical smears in a gynaecologic department after a period of ten years under the consideration of colposcopic findings(author's transl)].
Michalzik K
Arch Gynakol; 1975; 218(2):149-68. PubMed ID: 1174025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endocervical detection of CIN. Cytobrush versus cotton.
Schettino F; Sideri M; Cangini L; Candiani M; Zannoni E; Maggi R; Ferrari A
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1993; 14(3):234-6. PubMed ID: 8508881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cytologic features of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions involving endocervical glands on thin-layer cytology.
Selvaggi SM
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):689-90. PubMed ID: 16450913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening.
van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP; Gaillard HL; Go DM
Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3604538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of preoperative exfoliative cervical cytology with subsequent histology.
Parker A; Ueki M
N Z Med J; 1986 Jun; 99(803):414-6. PubMed ID: 3461355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Correlation between the cytology, coposcopy and the histopathology of abnormal lesions of the cervix].
Michon B; Demianczuk N
Union Med Can; 1977 May; 106(5):699-702. PubMed ID: 867611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.
Partoll LM; Javaheri G
Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of endocervical curettage in satisfactory colposcopy.
el-Dabh A; Rogers RE; Davis TE; Sutton GP
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Aug; 74(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 2748050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
Pairwuti S
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cytological classifications of vaginal smears. Current concepts of complex cytodiagnosis].
Kasabova M
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1984; 23(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 6385754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection, diagnostic evaluation and treatment of dysplasia, carcinoma in situ and early invasive cervical carcinoma.
Nelson JH; Averette HE; Richart RM
CA Cancer J Clin; 1979; 29(3):174-92. PubMed ID: 109174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Ectocervical scraping and endocervical curettage--an alternative procedure to conization in positive cytology (author's transl)].
Egger H; Hommel G; Michalzik K
Arch Gynecol; 1979 Sep; 227(3):249-65. PubMed ID: 496440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The clinician's response to the abnormal smear.
Gordon H
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Apr; 8(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 7261528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
