These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4842430)

  • 21. Visual-field asymmetries in letter recognition: evidence for asymmetry in early visual registration.
    Pitblado C; Petrides M; Riccio G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Aug; 49(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 503735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Parallel but temporally displaced visual half-field metacontrast functions.
    McKeever WF; Suberi M
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1974 May; 26(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 4840122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Similarity grouping of curves.
    Beck J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Jun; 36(3):1331-41. PubMed ID: 4711985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does cerebral dominance offer a sufficient explanation for laterality differences in tachistoscopic recognition?
    White MJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Apr; 36(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 4690737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development of hemifield differences in word recognition.
    Miller LK; Turner S
    J Educ Psychol; 1973 Oct; 65(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 4778796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Specific and general set in tachistoscopic perception of alphanumeric characters.
    Riley TM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Aug; 39(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 4415853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Similarity grouping and peripheral discriminability under uncertainty.
    Beck J
    Am J Psychol; 1972 Mar; 85(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 5019427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hemiretinal effects in tachistoscopic letter recognition.
    Neill DO; Sampson H; Gribben JA
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 Nov; 91(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 5126645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Order of report and order of scanning in tachistoscopic recognition.
    Scheerer E
    Can J Psychol; 1972 Dec; 26(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 4656820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Simple measures of visual-lobe size and search performance.
    Courtney AJ; Chau HS
    Ergonomics; 1985 Sep; 28(9):1319-31. PubMed ID: 4065088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Visual sensitivity.
    Brown JL
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1973; 24():151-86. PubMed ID: 4198917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Laterality differences in perception: a review.
    White MJ
    Psychol Bull; 1969 Dec; 72(6):387-405. PubMed ID: 4905908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Vision with two eyes.
    Bishop PO
    Nihon Seirigaku Zasshi; 1983; 45(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 6345758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Support for lateralization of the Whorf effect beyond the realm of color discrimination.
    Gilbert AL; Regier T; Kay P; Ivry RB
    Brain Lang; 2008 May; 105(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 17628656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hemifield differences in binocular fusion.
    Carmon A; Nachshon I
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Feb; 36(1):175-84. PubMed ID: 4686707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Right visual field superiority for accuracy of recognition of famous faces in normals.
    Marzi CA; Berlucchi G
    Neuropsychologia; 1977; 15(6):751-6. PubMed ID: 600370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bilateral tachistoscopic perception, handedness, and laterality. II. Nonverbal stimuli.
    Schmuller J; Goodman R
    Brain Lang; 1980 Sep; 11(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 7427713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of brightness differences on the Panum phenomenon.
    Pandina RJ; Lawson RB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Jun; 36(3):695-702. PubMed ID: 4704306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visual-field asymmetry in face recognition as a function of face discriminability and interstimulus interval.
    Sjoberg W; Gruber B; Swatloski C
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Jun; 72(3 Pt 2):1267-71. PubMed ID: 1961674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interhemispheric effects on choice reaction times to one-, two-, and three-letter displays.
    Umiltá C; Frost N; Hyman R
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Apr; 93(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 5013334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.