These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4844469)

  • 1. Can lateral asymmetries in attention explain interfield differences in visual perception?
    Berlucchi G; Brizzolara D; Marzi CA; Rizzolatti G; Umiltà C
    Cortex; 1974 Jun; 10(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 4844469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemispheric asymmetry: verbal and spatial encoding of visual stimuli.
    Geffen G; Bradshaw JL; Nettleton NC
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Sep; 95(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 5070292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hemispheric asymmetries in tachistoscopic information-processing.
    White MJ
    Br J Psychol; 1972 Nov; 63(4):497-508. PubMed ID: 4574450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-modal asymmetries in perception related to asymmetry in cerebral function.
    Hines D; Satz P
    Neuropsychologia; 1974 Mar; 12(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 4842383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemispheric differences in the discrimination of line orientation.
    Umiltà C; Rizzolatti G; Marzi CA; Zamboni G; Franzini C; Camarda R; Berlucchi G
    Neuropsychologia; 1974 Mar; 12(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 4210380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parallel but temporally displaced visual half-field metacontrast functions.
    McKeever WF; Suberi M
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1974 May; 26(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 4840122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Word classes and hemispheric specialization.
    Caplan D; Holmes JM; Marshall JC
    Neuropsychologia; 1974 Jul; 12(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 4417034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does cerebral dominance offer a sufficient explanation for laterality differences in tachistoscopic recognition?
    White MJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Apr; 36(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 4690737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does post-exposural directional scanning offer a sufficient explanation for lateral differences in tachistoscopic recognition?
    McKeever WF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Feb; 38(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 4815516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laterality differences in perception: a review.
    White MJ
    Psychol Bull; 1969 Dec; 72(6):387-405. PubMed ID: 4905908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The time course of lateral asymmetries in visual perception of letters.
    Wilkins A; Stewart A
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 May; 102(5):905-8. PubMed ID: 4847740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial discrimination systems and cerebral lateralization.
    Pohl W; Butters N; Goodglass H
    Cortex; 1972 Sep; 8(3):305-14. PubMed ID: 4637925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual asymmetry in perception of faces.
    Gilbert C; Bakan P
    Neuropsychologia; 1973 Jul; 11(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 4792186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laterality effects for simple and complex geometrical figures, and nonsense patterns.
    Umiltà C; Bagnara S; Simion F
    Neuropsychologia; 1978; 16(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 634461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemispheric differences in the discrimination of curvature.
    Longden K; Ellis C; Iversen SD
    Neuropsychologia; 1976; 14(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 934453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual information processing in the left and right hemispheres.
    Hines D
    Neuropsychologia; 1978; 16(5):593-600. PubMed ID: 732992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tachistoscopic word recognition performance under conditions of simultaneous bilateral presentation.
    Mackavey W; Curcio F; Rosen J
    Neuropsychologia; 1975 Jan; 13(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 1109458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemispheric differences in evoked potentials to verbal and nonverbal stimuli in the left and right visual fields.
    Buchsbaum M; Fedio P
    Physiol Behav; 1970 Feb; 5(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 5525797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemispheric differences in processing visual patterns.
    Bradshaw JL; Gates A; Patterson K
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1976 Nov; 28(4):667-81. PubMed ID: 1013284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Dominance of a hemisphere and optical perception with tachistoscope examination].
    Deegener G
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1974 Apr; 26(4):193-201. PubMed ID: 4848523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.