321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4844661)
1. The strengths and weaknesses of university review committees to protect human rights.
Dymond S
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1974 Aug; 55(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 4844661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ten ways to improve IRBs.
Robertson JA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Feb; 9(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 429060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
Cowan DH
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The report of the Advisory Research Committee on the ethics review of research involving human subjects.
Queens Gazette; 1974 : 1-5, 30 Jan; 6(4) Suppl):. PubMed ID: 11663457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The National Commission on IRBs: an evolutionary approach.
Veatch RM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Feb; 9(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 429058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Making the scientific ethical.
Wilson HS
J Nurs Adm; 1984 Nov; 14(11):6-7. PubMed ID: 6567661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Experience of a human investigation committee in a Canadian medical school.
Heughan C; Barrowman JA; Murphy TM; Stuart SR
Can Med Assoc J; 1984 Apr; 130(8):991-6. PubMed ID: 6704862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical issues in the substantive and procedural aspects of research ethics review.
Meslin EM
Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):179-91. PubMed ID: 10125789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hyperbaric research at Duke University--ethical considerations.
Bennett PB; Kylstra JA
Forsvarsmedicin; 1973; 9(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 11661280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical considerations in human experimentation.
Bernstein JE
J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs; 1975; 15(8-9):579-90. PubMed ID: 11661224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Health science research ethics: a critique.
Coburn D
Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 10125790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Auckland hospital ethical committee: the first three years.
Richmond DE
N Z Med J; 1977 Jul; 86(591):10-2. PubMed ID: 271855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safeguarding human rights in medical experiments.
WHO Chron; 1979 Sep; 33(9):326-8. PubMed ID: 532129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Protection of human research subjects: are ethics necessary?
Varley AB
J Leg Med (N Y); 1976 Feb; 4(2):23-6. PubMed ID: 1082480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The subject is children.
Hiatt F
Trial; 1975; 11(6):19+. PubMed ID: 11662203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Is informed consent always necessary for randomized, controlled trials?
Truog RD; Robinson W; Randolph A; Morris A
N Engl J Med; 1999 Mar; 340(10):804-7. PubMed ID: 10072420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In loco parentis. Minimal risk as an ethical threshold for research upon children.
Freedman B; Fuks A; Weijer C
Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(2):13-9. PubMed ID: 8463083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics of clinical trials for research ethics boards: proceedings of a national workshop.
National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
NCBHR Commun; 1991; 2(2):4-23. PubMed ID: 11659919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Research review at NIH.
Lipsett MB; Fletcher JC; Secundy M
Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Feb; 9(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 429057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled.
Wash Univ Law Q; 1975; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
