These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4844661)
1. The strengths and weaknesses of university review committees to protect human rights. Dymond S Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1974 Aug; 55(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 4844661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ten ways to improve IRBs. Robertson JA Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Feb; 9(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 429060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Human experimentation: the review process in practice. Cowan DH Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The report of the Advisory Research Committee on the ethics review of research involving human subjects. Queens Gazette; 1974 : 1-5, 30 Jan; 6(4) Suppl):. PubMed ID: 11663457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The National Commission on IRBs: an evolutionary approach. Veatch RM Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Feb; 9(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 429058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Making the scientific ethical. Wilson HS J Nurs Adm; 1984 Nov; 14(11):6-7. PubMed ID: 6567661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Experience of a human investigation committee in a Canadian medical school. Heughan C; Barrowman JA; Murphy TM; Stuart SR Can Med Assoc J; 1984 Apr; 130(8):991-6. PubMed ID: 6704862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical issues in the substantive and procedural aspects of research ethics review. Meslin EM Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):179-91. PubMed ID: 10125789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hyperbaric research at Duke University--ethical considerations. Bennett PB; Kylstra JA Forsvarsmedicin; 1973; 9(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 11661280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical considerations in human experimentation. Bernstein JE J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs; 1975; 15(8-9):579-90. PubMed ID: 11661224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Health science research ethics: a critique. Coburn D Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 10125790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Auckland hospital ethical committee: the first three years. Richmond DE N Z Med J; 1977 Jul; 86(591):10-2. PubMed ID: 271855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safeguarding human rights in medical experiments. WHO Chron; 1979 Sep; 33(9):326-8. PubMed ID: 532129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Protection of human research subjects: are ethics necessary? Varley AB J Leg Med (N Y); 1976 Feb; 4(2):23-6. PubMed ID: 1082480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The subject is children. Hiatt F Trial; 1975; 11(6):19+. PubMed ID: 11662203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Is informed consent always necessary for randomized, controlled trials? Truog RD; Robinson W; Randolph A; Morris A N Engl J Med; 1999 Mar; 340(10):804-7. PubMed ID: 10072420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In loco parentis. Minimal risk as an ethical threshold for research upon children. Freedman B; Fuks A; Weijer C Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(2):13-9. PubMed ID: 8463083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics of clinical trials for research ethics boards: proceedings of a national workshop. National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada) NCBHR Commun; 1991; 2(2):4-23. PubMed ID: 11659919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Research review at NIH. Lipsett MB; Fletcher JC; Secundy M Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Feb; 9(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 429057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled. Wash Univ Law Q; 1975; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]