These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 484619)

  • 1. Fetal risk in delivery with the Shute parallel forceps: analysis of 1,503 forceps deliveries.
    Seidenschnur G; Koepcke E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct; 135(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 484619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Injury hazards in deliveries using the Shute forceps (analysis of 1016 forceps deliveries)].
    Seidenschnur G; Heinrich J; Koepcke E; Hopp H; Hamann H; König U
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1977; 99(21):1286-93. PubMed ID: 595964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Midforceps delivery: a critical review.
    Richardson DA; Evans MI; Cibils LA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Mar; 145(5):621-32. PubMed ID: 6338723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The use of forceps delivery in own analysis].
    Neuberg M
    Ginekol Pol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 10860255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Materno-fetal morbidity of instrumental deliveries: forceps versus spatulas. About a series of 77 cases].
    Tsoyem Mouafou AC; Morel O; Lamy C; Monceau E; Judlin P; Muhlstein J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Mar; 42(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 22521984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries.
    Benavides L; Wu JM; Hundley AF; Ivester TS; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1702-6. PubMed ID: 15902181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The midforceps: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Dierker LJ; Rosen MG; Thompson K; Debanne S; Linn P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 May; 152(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 4003466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.
    Johnson JH; Figueroa R; Garry D; Elimian A; Maulik D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 14990415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy.
    Hudelist G; Gelle'n J; Singer C; Ruecklinger E; Czerwenka K; Kandolf O; Keckstein J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 192(3):875-81. PubMed ID: 15746685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of outcomes between operative vaginal deliveries and spontaneous vaginal deliveries in southeast Nigeria.
    Lawani LO; Anozie OB; Ezeonu PO; Iyoke CA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 24717812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should we abandon Kielland's forceps?
    Cardozo LD; Gibb DM; Studd JW; Cooper DJ
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Jul; 287(6388):315-7. PubMed ID: 6409289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound used to predict cases of complicated operative (vacuum and forceps) deliveries in nulliparous women.
    Sainz JA; García-Mejido JA; Aquise A; Bonomi MJ; Borrero C; De La Fuente P; Fernández-Palacín A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Dec; 96(12):1490-1497. PubMed ID: 28889406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries.
    Mesleh RA; Al-Sawadi HM; Kurdi AM
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Jul; 23(7):811-3. PubMed ID: 12174231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal trends and morbidities of vacuum, forceps, and combined use of both.
    Fong A; Wu E; Pan D; Chung JH; Ogunyemi DA
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1886-91. PubMed ID: 24635372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of instrument preference for operative deliveries on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.
    Abenhaim HA; Morin L; Benjamin A; Kinch RA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Oct; 134(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 17112650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes.
    Gardella C; Taylor M; Benedetti T; Hitti J; Critchlow C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):896-902. PubMed ID: 11641674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
    Anate M
    West Afr J Med; 1991; 10(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 1911480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.