These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 484703)
21. A ballistic evaluation of the impact resistance of spectacle lens materials. Oliver AL; Chou BR Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Oct; 70(10):822-7. PubMed ID: 8247484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Protection from ultraviolet exposure in aphakic erythropsia. Kamel ID; Parker JA Can J Ophthalmol; 1973 Oct; 8(4):563-5. PubMed ID: 4751903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Remedies to inadvertent frequent-or-rare defects found in today's permanent spectacles for aphakia. Welsh RC Ann Ophthalmol; 1972 Jun; 4(6):432-5. PubMed ID: 5030225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Efficacy and durability of ultraviolet tints in CR-39 ophthalmic lenses. Lee DY; Brown WL; Trachimowicz R J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Nov; 68(11):709-14. PubMed ID: 9409106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A new standard for spectacle lenses. Babchinitser MI; Aizenshtat LI Biomed Eng (NY); 1968; 2(2):122-3. PubMed ID: 5760774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact resistance: an overview. Innes AL J Am Optom Assoc; 1982 Aug; 53(8):635-40. PubMed ID: 7130604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Substantiation of the design parameters of high-refraction negative spectacle lenses. Aizenshtat LI Biomed Eng (NY); 1971; 5(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 5136136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact resistance of ophthalmic lenses of various strengths and the influence of frame design. Keeney AH; Renaldo DP Can J Ophthalmol; 1975 Jul; 10(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 1148909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The dotting lens. Davis JK J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 May; 50(5):591-4. PubMed ID: 458121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The role of edge failures in impact testing of ophthalmic lenses. Berger RE J Am Optom Assoc; 1976 May; 47(5):599-605. PubMed ID: 1027865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparative assessment of eye protective devices and a proposed system of acceptance testing and grading. Wigglesworth EC Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom; 1972 Apr; 49(4):287-304. PubMed ID: 4503500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Magnification for a series of K spherical coaxial refracting surfaces. Mazzulla D Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1983 Dec; 60(12):990-4. PubMed ID: 6660283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Newly defined lens and frame factors in the reduction of eye injuries. Keeney AH; Renaldo D Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon; 1973 Jan; 52(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 4706123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Magnification in microscopic lenses. Brazelton FA Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom; 1969 Apr; 46(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 5253429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Highway tests of photochromic lenses. Allen MJ J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 Sep; 50(9):1023-7. PubMed ID: 501010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quality of glass and polycarbonate bifocal dress lenses. Stroud JS J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Apr; 60(4):269-71. PubMed ID: 2723321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Standards of eyeglasses. Rosenthal J; Folsom WC Med Care; 1973; 11(6):240-53. PubMed ID: 4575228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of multiple antireflective coatings and center thickness on resistance of polycarbonate spectacle lenses to penetration by pointed missiles. Chou BR; Gupta A; Hovis JK Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):964-9. PubMed ID: 16317372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]