These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4847740)

  • 1. The time course of lateral asymmetries in visual perception of letters.
    Wilkins A; Stewart A
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 May; 102(5):905-8. PubMed ID: 4847740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemispheric differences in serial versus parallel precessing.
    Cohen G
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Mar; 97(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 4705242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hemispheric asymmetries in tachistoscopic information-processing.
    White MJ
    Br J Psychol; 1972 Nov; 63(4):497-508. PubMed ID: 4574450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual masking, handedness, and laterality.
    Luria SM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):803-11. PubMed ID: 4842435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does post-exposural directional scanning offer a sufficient explanation for lateral differences in tachistoscopic recognition?
    McKeever WF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Feb; 38(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 4815516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemispheric differences in the discrimination of line orientation.
    Umiltà C; Rizzolatti G; Marzi CA; Zamboni G; Franzini C; Camarda R; Berlucchi G
    Neuropsychologia; 1974 Mar; 12(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 4210380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laterality effects for simple and complex geometrical figures, and nonsense patterns.
    Umiltà C; Bagnara S; Simion F
    Neuropsychologia; 1978; 16(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 634461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The psychological refractory period and the effect of stimulus discriminability.
    Tolkmitt FJ; Lunn SE
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 86(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 4742381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tachistoscopic word recognition performance under conditions of simultaneous bilateral presentation.
    Mackavey W; Curcio F; Rosen J
    Neuropsychologia; 1975 Jan; 13(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 1109458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interhemispheric effects on choice reaction times to one-, two-, and three-letter displays.
    Umiltá C; Frost N; Hyman R
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Apr; 93(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 5013334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of hemifield differences in word recognition.
    Miller LK; Turner S
    J Educ Psychol; 1973 Oct; 65(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 4778796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Some factors in the recognition of tachistoscopically presented alphabetical arrays.
    Fudin R; Kenny JT
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Dec; 35(3):951-9. PubMed ID: 4643992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complexity as a determinant of visual field effects for random forms.
    Hannay HJ; Rogers JP; Durant RF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1976 Feb; 40(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 1266650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Haidinger's brushes phenomenon for control of eye-fixation in a laterality experiment.
    Yamada K; Sugano L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Aug; 67(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 3211696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of visual acuity in tachistoscopic recognition of three-letter words.
    Curcio F; Mackavey W; Rosen J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):755-61. PubMed ID: 4842430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Order of report and order of scanning in tachistoscopic recognition.
    Scheerer E
    Can J Psychol; 1972 Dec; 26(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 4656820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laterality differences in tachistoscopic word recognition in normal and delayed readers in elementary school.
    Olson ME
    Neuropsychologia; 1973 Jul; 11(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 4792185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developmental differences in the field of view during covert and overt search.
    Miller LK
    Child Dev; 1973 Jun; 44(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 4705552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can lateral asymmetries in attention explain interfield differences in visual perception?
    Berlucchi G; Brizzolara D; Marzi CA; Rizzolatti G; Umiltà C
    Cortex; 1974 Jun; 10(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 4844469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of "physical" matching task for simultaneously presented pairs of letters.
    Hershenson M; Price KP
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Feb; 97(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 4705236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.