78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4851113)
21. [Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of vacuum punch biopsy versus high speed core biopsy].
Sedivy R; Partik B; Helbich T; Breitenecker G; Wolf G
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1998; 148(14):331-4. PubMed ID: 9816644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Analysis of 500 cases of cervical conization].
Reyna Hinojosa R; Puente González H; González Ramírez R; De Los Santos FA
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1980 Jan; 47(279):31-46. PubMed ID: 7364261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Cervical carcinoma in situ undetected by Papanicolaou smear but identified by cervicography. A case report.
Ferris DG
J Fam Pract; 1994 Jan; 38(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 8289055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for the detection of adenocarcinoma of the cervix: a study of 49 cases.
Krane JF; Granter SR; Trask CE; Hogan CL; Lee KR
Cancer; 2001 Feb; 93(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11241260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnosis in preinvasive lesions of the cervix.
Karjalainen O; Järvilehto U; Nieminen U; Timonen S
Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 4851356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Severe cervical glandular cell lesions and severe cervical combined lesions: predictive value of the papanicolaou smear.
van Aspert-van Erp AJ; Smedts FM; Vooijs GP
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 102(4):210-7. PubMed ID: 15368312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Common problems in Papanicolaou smear interpretation.
DeMay RM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 9111106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Recurrent invasive adenocarcinoma after hysterectomy for cervical adenocarcinoma in situ.
Krivak TC; Retherford B; Voskuil S; Rose GS; Alagoz T
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 May; 77(2):334-5. PubMed ID: 10785491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cytopathology and the management of early invasive cancer of the uterine cervix.
Johnston WW; Myers B; Creasman WT; Owens SM
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Sep; 60(3):350-3. PubMed ID: 7121916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Management and follow-up of patients with adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Poynor EA; Barakat RR; Hoskins WJ
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 May; 57(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 7729727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Atypical glandular cells in cervical smears from women who have undergone cone biopsy. A potential diagnostic pitfall.
Lee KR
Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(5):705-9. PubMed ID: 8362582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization.
Lapaquette TK; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Doherty MG; Yandell RB; Buchanan VS
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):440-3. PubMed ID: 8355949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Evaluation of the agreement between cytological and histological examinations in the diagnosis of cervical cancer].
Kujawska E; Waszyński E
Wiad Lek; 1981 Aug; 34(15):1263-6. PubMed ID: 7331327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Malignant lymphoma identified on a cervical cytologic smear, with immunophenotypic analysis.
King JA; Elkhalifa MY; Michael C
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1228-30. PubMed ID: 9250322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. THE ROLE OF PUNCH BIOPSY AND CERVICAL SMEAR IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF CERVICAL CARCINOMA IN SITU.
THOMISON JB; TOSH RH; JUNG WF; PRESTON WH
South Med J; 1965 Jan; 58():79-81. PubMed ID: 14227740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix: some current views.
Cavanagh D; Praphat H; Ruffolo EH
Obstet Gynecol Annu; 1981; 10():193-236. PubMed ID: 7024872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Round table: Carcinoma of the cervix uteri].
Escudero P; Saavedra R; Martínez L; Salas O; Morales E; González J
Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1982; 47(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 6927318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The clinician's response to the abnormal smear.
Gordon H
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Apr; 8(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 7261528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Punch biopsy or conization.
Koch F; Albrechtsen R
Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun; 19(4):127-30. PubMed ID: 5041569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
