These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Roe v. Doe: a remedy for disclosure of psychiatric confidences. Rutgers Law Rev; 1975; 29(1):190-209. PubMed ID: 11664567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Informed consent process is deemed "legally and ethically invalid" by witness. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Confidences of malpractice plaintiffs: should their secrets be revealed? Turner JW South Tex Law Rev; 1987; 28(1):71-95. PubMed ID: 11650782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Confidentiality: ethical and legal aspects for Canadian psychologists. Cram SJ; Dobson KS Can Psychol; 1993 Jul; 34(3):342-63. PubMed ID: 11652843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Changing the paradigm for informed consent. Dagi TF J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(3):246-50. PubMed ID: 7841477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Recent topics on ethical issues in psychiatry, mental care and welfare]. Takahashi K Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2002; 104(9):725-34. PubMed ID: 12481440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Last rights: Oregon's new Death with Dignity Act. Graham KT Willamette Law Rev; 1995; 31(3):601-46. PubMed ID: 11660301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Ethical and legal difficulties in the evaluation of psychiatric therapy procedures]. Helmchen H; Müller-Oerlinghausen B Nervenarzt; 1975 Jul; 46(7):397-403. PubMed ID: 1207858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Doctors, the police and patients' legal rights. Brown FN Can Med Assoc J; 1976 May; 114(10):958, 961, 965. PubMed ID: 1268781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Patients' rights and informed consent: an emergency case for hospitals? Callan DE Calif West Law Rev; 1976; 12(2):406-28. PubMed ID: 11664656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Contract law as a viable alternative to problems of informed consent. Norton ML Cathol Lawyer; 1975; 21(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 11664527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Informed consent: pondering a new piece of the puzzle. Jacobson JA J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(3):244-6. PubMed ID: 7841476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Guidelines for accepting volunteers: consent, ethical implications and the function of a peer review. Morris RC; Moraczewski A; Carr EA Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1972; 13(5):782-95. PubMed ID: 5068583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Physicians' ethical responsibilities under co-pay insurance: should potential fiscal liability become part of informed consent? Turner JF; Mason T; Anderson D; Gulati A; Sbarbaro JA J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 7632999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The new face of legal psychiatry. Robitscher J Am J Psychiatry; 1972 Sep; 129(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 4559783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]