These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 485367)

  • 1. [Early and late complications following surgical abortion].
    Beller FK
    Arch Gynecol; 1979 Jul; 228(1-4):349-64. PubMed ID: 485367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The hazards of vacuum aspiration in late first trimester abortions.
    Moberg P; Sjöberg B; Wiqvist N
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1975; 54(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 1136716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complications of induced abortion.
    Hepburn S
    Fam Plann Inf Serv; 1981 Apr; 1(6):21-8. PubMed ID: 12263451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early complications after induced first-trimester abortion.
    Heisterberg L; Kringelbach M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1987; 66(3):201-4. PubMed ID: 3661126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dilatation and evacuation procedures and second-trimester abortions. The role of physician skill and hospital setting.
    Cates W; Schulz KF; Grimes DA; Horowitz AJ; Lyon FA; Kravitz FH; Frisch MJ
    JAMA; 1982 Aug; 248(5):559-63. PubMed ID: 6285012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical aspects of induced abortion in South Australia from 1970-1984.
    Hart G; Macharper T
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Aug; 26(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 3468942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Risks in legal, induced abortion. Review of the literature].
    Stamm HE
    Gynakol Rundsch; 1980; 20(2):65-84. PubMed ID: 7192247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A five-year experience with second-trimester induced abortions: no increase in complication rate as compared to the first trimester.
    Jacot FR; Poulin C; Bilodeau AP; Morin M; Moreau S; Gendron F; Mercier D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Feb; 168(2):633-7. PubMed ID: 8438943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complications of abortion performed under local anesthesia.
    Thonneau P; Fougeyrollas B; Ducot B; Boubilley D; Dif J; Lalande M; Soulat C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1998 Oct; 81(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 9846716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A method of vacuum aspiration in early pregnancy in women with a history of severe gynecologic diseases].
    Khoreva LA
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1992 Feb; (2):37-9. PubMed ID: 1476226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. D & E midtrimester abortion: a medical innovation.
    Lewit S
    Women Health; 1982; 7(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 7180000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical dilatation with 16,16-dimethyl-trans-delta 2-PGE1 methyl ester (Cervagem) prior to vacuum aspiration. A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study.
    Christensen NJ; Bygdeman M
    Contraception; 1984 May; 29(5):457-64. PubMed ID: 6378517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Ambulatory abortion, its advantages and economic effectiveness].
    Golota VIa; Averina TA
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1992 Feb; (2):34-7. PubMed ID: 1476225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complications of first-trimester abortion by vacuum aspiration after cervical preparation with and without misoprostol: a multicentre randomised trial.
    Meirik O; My Huong NT; Piaggio G; Bergel E; von Hertzen H;
    Lancet; 2012 May; 379(9828):1817-24. PubMed ID: 22405255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Induced abortion by the suction method. An analysis of complication rates.
    Nesheim BI
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1984; 63(7):591-5. PubMed ID: 6516807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychological responses following medical abortion (using mifepristone and gemeprost) and surgical vacuum aspiration. A patient-centered, partially randomised prospective study.
    Henshaw R; Naji S; Russell I; Templeton A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1994 Nov; 73(10):812-8. PubMed ID: 7817735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of the introduction of new medical methods on therapeutic abortions at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh.
    Cameron ST; Glasier AF; Logan J; Benton L; Baird DT
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Dec; 103(12):1222-9. PubMed ID: 8968240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The frequency and management of uterine perforations during first-trimester abortions.
    Kaali SG; Szigetvari IA; Bartfai GS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Aug; 161(2):406-8. PubMed ID: 2527465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of medical abortion (using mifepristone and gemeprost) with surgical vacuum aspiration: efficacy and early medical sequelae.
    Henshaw RC; Naji SA; Russell IT; Templeton AA
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Nov; 9(11):2167-72. PubMed ID: 7868693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pregnancy termination: techniques, risks, and complications and their management.
    Castadot RG
    Fertil Steril; 1986 Jan; 45(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 3510916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.