These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4855493)
1. Evaluation fo membrane filter field monitors for microbiological air sampling. Fields ND; Oxborrow GS; Puleo JR; Herring CM Appl Microbiol; 1974 Mar; 27(3):517-20. PubMed ID: 4855493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microbial contamination associated with the Apollo 6 spacecraft during final assembly and testing. Puleo JR; Fields ND; Moore B; Graves RC Space Life Sci; 1970 May; 2(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 4399077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mathematical estimation on the level of microbial contamination on spacecraft surfaces by volumetric air sampling. Oxborrow GS; Roark AL; Fields ND; Puleo JR Appl Microbiol; 1974 Apr; 27(4):706-12. PubMed ID: 4151118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microbiological profiles of the Viking spacecraft. Puleo JR; Fields ND; Bergstrom SL; Oxborrow GS; Stabekis PD; Koukol R Appl Environ Microbiol; 1977 Feb; 33(2):379-84. PubMed ID: 848957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Molecular comparison of the sampling efficiency of four types of airborne bacterial samplers. Li K Sci Total Environ; 2011 Nov; 409(24):5493-8. PubMed ID: 21968260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microbiological profiles of four Apollo spacecraft. Puleo JR; Oxborrow GS; Fields ND; Herring CM; Smith LS Appl Microbiol; 1973 Dec; 26(6):838-45. PubMed ID: 4148913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments. An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Ripening of the Tollense cheese in foil as compared with the conventional technology. 1. Microbiological studies]. Wegner K; Behnke U Nahrung; 1972; 16(6):643-58. PubMed ID: 4574817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity. Mbareche H; Veillette M; Bilodeau GJ; Duchaine C Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30217848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the commercial bacterial air samplers by the new bacterial aerosol generator. Furuhashi M; Miyamae T Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1981 Mar; 28(1):7-21. PubMed ID: 7011587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microbiological hazard from the exhaust of a high-vacuum sterilizer. Barbeito MS; Brookey EA Appl Environ Microbiol; 1976 Nov; 32(5):671-8. PubMed ID: 825044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of polycarbonate filter in a molecular analytical system for the microbiological quality monitoring of recycled waters onboard ISS. Bechy-Loizeau AL; Flandrois JP; Abaibou H Life Sci Space Res (Amst); 2015 Jul; 6():29-35. PubMed ID: 26256625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative performance of two air samplers for monitoring airborne fungal propagules. Távora LG; Gambale W; Heins-Vaccari EM; Arriagada GL; Lacaz CS; Santos CR; Levin AS Braz J Med Biol Res; 2003 May; 36(5):613-6. PubMed ID: 12715080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative and qualitative microbiological profiles of the Apollo 10 and 11 spacecraft. Puleo JR; Oxborrow GS; Fields ND; Hall HE Appl Microbiol; 1970 Sep; 20(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 4394999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An assessment of the Sartorius MD8 microbiological air sampler. Parks SR; Bennett AM; Speight SE; Benbough JE J Appl Bacteriol; 1996 May; 80(5):529-34. PubMed ID: 9072525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of three impactor samplers for measuring airborne bacteria and fungi concentrations. Méheust D; Gangneux JP; Cann PL J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(8):455-9. PubMed ID: 23799861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Air hygiene in a pullet house: effects of air filtration on aerial pollutants measured in vivo and in vitro. Wathes CM; Johnson HE; Carpenter GA Br Poult Sci; 1991 Mar; 32(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 1904789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air. Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]