These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4858610)

  • 21. Is there a foundation in your future?
    Farrington JF
    J Tenn Med Assoc; 1973 Jun; 66(7):622-6. PubMed ID: 4737000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Professional standards review organizations. Section 249F of H.R. 1 as passed by the House and Senate October 17, 1972.
    Ariz Med; 1972 Dec; 29(12):934-44. PubMed ID: 4645142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Professional standards review organization.
    Bennett WF
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1973 Feb; 71(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 4687469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. PSRO project compares audit effectiveness.
    Jones R
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 Sep; 3(9):128-9. PubMed ID: 10273091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The changing focus of peer review under Medicare.
    Mellette PM
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1986 Dec; 8(10):7-48. PubMed ID: 10301158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. PSROs--implications for hospitals.
    McMahon JA
    Hospitals; 1974 Jan; 48(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 4855639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Recent court decisions impact current peer review activity.
    Beatty Y
    Tenn Med; 2010 Sep; 103(8):17. PubMed ID: 20961014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Threat to confidentiality of peer review data.
    Mosberg WH
    Neurosurgery; 1980 Mar; 6(3):340-1. PubMed ID: 7189833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Putting "peer" into PRO.
    Carroll RP
    Tex Med; 1989 Jun; 85(6):69-72. PubMed ID: 2660318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Letter: PSRO as educational process.
    Anderson L
    N Engl J Med; 1974 Jun; 290(23):1322-3. PubMed ID: 4857133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. From PSROs to PROs: regs are the next major step for the new peer review law.
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1982; 15(6):10-32. PubMed ID: 10273309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review.
    McKay J; Bowie P; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 12(6):622-9. PubMed ID: 17100861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Editorial: Peer review and all that.
    Moore FD
    J Indiana State Med Assoc; 1974 Nov; 67(11):1007-9. PubMed ID: 4474193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The PSRO and drug utilization review.
    Provost GP
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1973 Jul; 30(7):583. PubMed ID: 4736661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Utilization and quality control peer review organizations--a rose by any other name . . . ?
    Berg RN
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Nov; 71(11):793-6. PubMed ID: 6890977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Peer review: current law and policy problems.
    Hyman DA
    Healthspan; 1991; 8(7):3-10. PubMed ID: 10114029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The state of peer review in Delaware today.
    Battaglia VF
    Del Med J; 1988 Apr; 60(4):231-2, 237-9. PubMed ID: 3371511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Letter: Retroactive denial, peer review and PSRO.
    Detmer DE
    Wis Med J; 1975 Aug; 74(8):7. PubMed ID: 1172330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The concept of peer review.
    Ellis G
    Pa Nurse; 1975 Jan; 30(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 830075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Peer review. I. A review of the American literature].
    Stevens EC; Eijkman MA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1983 Nov; 90(11):540-4. PubMed ID: 6366592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.