These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4858610)

  • 41. Peer review: still tilting at windmills.
    Schorr B
    Physicians Manage; 1987 Oct; 27(10):124-6, 128, 133. PubMed ID: 10302231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Hospitals coping with the shadow of peer review.
    Tokarski C
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Dec; 19(52):22-4, 30, 33-5. PubMed ID: 10296739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Establishing Professional Standards Review Organizations.
    Blackburn GL
    N Engl J Med; 1973 Jul; 289(1):48. PubMed ID: 4736177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Peer review organizations.
    N Engl J Med; 1986 Apr; 314(17):1121-2. PubMed ID: 3960088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Peer review and you.
    Rhyne RH
    J Med Assoc State Ala; 1973 May; 42(11):767-8. PubMed ID: 4735406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Peer review: is it working?
    Investor Owned Hosp Rev; 1976 Feb; 9(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 10273142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. EMCRO: the hospital.
    Foster LA; Wells SB
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1973 Aug; 62(8):284-6. PubMed ID: 4737865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Peer review.
    Ramphal M
    Am J Nurs; 1974 Jan; 74(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 4491941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of medical care.
    N Engl J Med; 1976 Dec; 295(23):1323-4. PubMed ID: 988481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Letter: Canadian Council on Hospital Accreditation.
    Karnauchow PN
    Can Med Assoc J; 1974 Aug; 111(3):215 passim. PubMed ID: 4859383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Peer review.
    Denholm BE
    Mod Vet Pract; 1977 Jul; 58(7):589-93. PubMed ID: 560622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Peer reviewers are ready to sell your track record.
    Owens A
    Med Econ; 1984 Jun; 61(12):39-40, 44, 49. PubMed ID: 10273524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Blueprint for control: no-knock peer review.
    Mod Hosp; 1973 Jul; 121(1):7 passim. PubMed ID: 4799070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The problems of a "gross and flagrant" peer review.
    Fitzgerald RM
    Med Group Manage; 1987; 34(4):17, 23. PubMed ID: 10301731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Qualidigm evaluates Medicaid managed care health plan performance.
    Bell J; Casey B; Waite B
    Conn Med; 1999 Jun; 63(6):355-6. PubMed ID: 10432768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Medical review--friend or foe?
    Essrig IM
    JFMA; 1973 Mar; 60(3):34-40. PubMed ID: 4687254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. PSRO--what is it really all about?
    Weyl WL
    Va Med Mon (1918); 1973 Sep; 100(9):809-10. PubMed ID: 4738184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A physician's perspective of peer review.
    Nelson AR
    Internist; 1986 Jul; 27(6):15-6. PubMed ID: 10278602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Medical audit in the United States: a model for medical review in out country? Report of a study trip].
    Casparie AF
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1977 Apr; 121(16):684-8. PubMed ID: 854113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Editorial: On peering peers.
    Gray DE
    J Kans Med Soc; 1974 Feb; 75(2):48-9. PubMed ID: 4856066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.