These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. The family in the pathogenesis of schizophrenic and neurotic disorders. Alanen YO Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl; 1966; 190():1-654. PubMed ID: 5335788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The human content response in the Holtzman Inkblot Technique. Fernald PS; Linden JD J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1966 Oct; 30(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 5339574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Modes of organizing progressively changing stimulation: a developmental study. Schnall M; Kemper T Am J Psychol; 1968 Sep; 81(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 4882682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Psychophysical scaling of brightness and shape dimensions in mentally retarded persons. Switzky HN Am J Ment Defic; 1971 Nov; 76(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 5148364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Mental and personality characteristics of married couples with infectious forms of syphilis]. Egorov NA; Spirov G; Kiriakova N Vestn Dermatol Venerol; 1981 May; (5):73-6. PubMed ID: 6457463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of children with cleft palate and their siblings on projective test personality factors. Wirls CJ; Plotkin RR Cleft Palate J; 1971 Oct; 8():399-408. PubMed ID: 5004872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Personal factors influencing the retarded person's success at work: a report from Israel. Sali J; Amir M Am J Ment Defic; 1971 Jul; 76(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 5121021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Golden section. Reassessment of the perimetric hypothesis. Hintz JM; Nelson TM Am J Psychol; 1970 Mar; 83(1):126-9. PubMed ID: 5449389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Projective questions for children: the test of Pigem-van Krevelen-Kritzberg. van Krevelen DA Acta Paedopsychiatr; 1971 Sep; 38(9):271-80. PubMed ID: 4947745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Some theoretical considerations on the nature of ambiguity and the use of stimulus dimensions in projective techniques. Epstein S J Consult Psychol; 1966 Jun; 30(3):183-92. PubMed ID: 5327054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the drawing and matching methods for judging shape. Smith AH Percept Mot Skills; 1966 Aug; 23(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 5336230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Is gradual recognition of pictures by Ethiopian subjects a differentiation process or a pattern contruction process? Kennedy JM Perception; 1974; 3(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 4614219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]